District 3 Commisioner Race: Ryan McAllister on the Issues

We put the same questions to all four candidates in the race to replace Kathleen Kler as the Jefferson County District 3 Commissioner.  You can read the answers from Craig Durgan and Jon Cooke by clicking on their names.  Friday we will publish answers from Greg Brotherton.  Now it is Ryan McAllister’s turn.

Ryan is running as a Democrat.  As I have previously disclosed, long before I started the Free Press, when Ryan was the only candidate in race, I gave him my support.  We met during the campaign to stop Prop 1, a regressive property tax increase  in the name of “affordable housing.”  But it would have made housing less affordable with no real prospect of doing anything about the county’s housing crunch.  He stuck his neck out for the working poor and low-income homeowners in the county and incurred the wrath of the PT political establishment behind that very bad idea imported from Seattle. He judged the issue correctly.  District 3 voters saw it for what it was.  Quilcene voted “no” by an 8 to 1 margin, with  Brinnon and Port Ludlow not far behind.  District 2 crushed it.  Even Port Townsend voted it down.  Prop 1 lost in all but 2 precincts throughout the county.

I was impressed by his integrity and determination.  We come from nearly opposite sides of the political spectrum, but found we could talk honestly and with mutual respect about our different ideas–something so sorely lacking in today’s bitterly divided America.
Ryan is passionate about helping people, selflessly, as demonstrated by his early career choice of being a firefighter.  Jumping into a fire to save others–reminds me of how the Prop 1 fight looked when we started out.
Enough from me.  Make your own decision. Other good people have offered themselves in this race. We can be impressed with them, too.  Be informed about the issues and the candidates.  Now, let’s hear from Ryan McAllister.

1.  What do you see as the most critical need facing District 3 and what specifically will you do to address that need?

I will seek to create a Task Force to streamline the permitting process. The Task Force should be comprised of homeowners, contractors, septic designers, other stakeholders. 2. Much needed sewer systems for communities in south county to promote business and affordable housing. 3.High-speed Internet is critical infrastructure for rural communities to support local entrepreneurs and businesses. I will explore a public-private partnership. In 2018 internet is proving to be another vital utility such as water, power and sewer.
2.  There has been much talk of the need for regulatory reform by all the candidates in order to promote a more prosperous District 3.  Which regulations would you change and how?

As stated above I seek to streamline the Department of Community Development permitting process. The task force that I will create will be made up of professionals in the industry such as contractors, septic designers, developers, and other stakeholders. The goal of this task force will be to find SPECIFIC areas where the county can make changes to better and more effectively serve the community.

3.  What should the rest of the county, and Port Townsend in particular, be doing to alleviate the poverty and lack of economic opportunity in District 3?
I have a six-part plan that if elected I will institute to bring economic opportunities to the county. Community Planning, Infrastructure, Economic Development, Housing, Healthcare, and Environment. More info at www.ryanmcallister.net
4.  What would you like to tell voters about why you should be the next District 3 County Commissioner?
I am a young man who works hard for his community. I truly love our county and its rural character; my goal is to preserve and enhance that character. I will represent everyone in the county regardless of party affiliation because we are all neighbors who choose to live here.

The Government We Deserve

Philosophers and political thinkers have observed rightly over the centuries that people get the government they deserve. But a couple of news items over the past week got me wondering whether Jefferson County really deserves such bad government.
First there was news that enrollment in the Chimacum School District dropped 11.9 % during the past year. Not to worry though, as Superintendent Rick Thompson noted that this decline is in keeping with the overall trends of the past two decades. We presume this is supposed to make us all feel better.
Thompson, while taking a break from the arduous task of neglecting 20 years of declining enrollment, contacted some of the parents who pulled their kids out of Chimacum schools to find out why. “There’s not a single cause,” said Thompson, who cited concerns about housing and daycare being in short supply, not to mention families increasingly homeschooling their kids or taking them to Kitsap County, which makes sense. Jefferson County residents who can’t find what they need in local stores already spend millions of dollars in sales tax in Kitsap County so why not send our kids there too?

Perhaps none of the parents told Thompson that they pulled their kids out of Chimacum schools because 75% of 11th graders failed the state’s Smarter Balance Assessment tests in math during the 2016-17 school year. It would also be interesting to learn how many Chimacum High students were allowed to cut math class on March 14 so they could be exploited by the movement to relieve people of their constitutional rights.

Then there’s Laura Parsons, construction project manager for the Water Street road and utility project in Port Townsend. The first phase of the project is not done. It will not be done on time. While admitting the delay, the Berkeley trained civil engineer chirped, “But other staff were telling me that we should be pleased that we are wrapping up such a complex project within a few weeks of the projected completion date.”

The Hoover Dam was a complex project. The Apollo 11 moon landing was a complex project. This is asphalt and concrete and utilities. But let’s congratulate everyone who was part of this blocks-long epic in civil engineering that won’t be done on time. It’s the government equivalent of a youth soccer league participation trophy.

Jefferson Land Trust Executive Director Richard Tucker’s opinion piece in the Port Townsend Leader seemed the most detached from reality. The Land Trust isn’t ‘government’ per se but it works hand in glove with state and local governments and is happy to take government money so they’re part of the club. The lead for Tucker’s July 11 essay reads like an Usborne pre-school fairy tale: “There are many little known pockets of magic scattered throughout our community. One of these hidden treasures is the Kah Tai Prairie Preserve.”

This pocket of magic was less than mystical for 60-year-old Lawrence Merrell Alan, who was beaten bloody in broad daylight there on June 3. Our hidden treasure wasn’t so hidden from William Anthony Ingalsbe and John Rayford Fleming, two housing-challenged guys charged with attacking Alan, who we understand was awaiting trial on charges of selling meth in a school zone when he was attacked. Yeah, let’s take the family to that place.

This is a single week of news about bad government – the government we’ve got. Failing schools are met with a shrug by those in charge of them. Municipalities are satisfied when construction projects don’t get finished as promised to taxpayers. Dangerous public places are promoted as magical. Does Jefferson County really deserve this government? It appears so. Not a lot of people seem inclined to vote those responsible for this mess out of office.
As heartbreaking as these three episodes are, it’s no less tragic to realize a majority of us are okay with this status quo. Those who believe that failed schools, botched road projects and public safety problems are unacceptable seem to be in the minority.
[Editor’s Note:  Chimacum High School Principal Brian MacKenzie commented on this column when it appeared at our old blogspot.com site.  The comments did not carry over in the transition to the new .com site.  Mr. McKenzie asked that we republish his comment.  Here it is:

The author gets nearly everything wrong about the Chimacum School District.

Mr. Hogenson falsely accused the current superintendent of “neglecting 20 years of declining enrollment.”

In fact, Mr. Thompson first joined the district just 3 years ago.

Over the past two decades, CSD has worked to address enrollment challenges in three ways:

First, by diversifying CSD’s offerings to compete for students (e.g., developing the Pi and Futures alternative learning programs, adding Advanced Placement courses, expanding College in the High School partnerships with local colleges & universities).

Second, through responsible budgeting. Earlier this year, the state auditor recognized CSD assistant superintendent Art Clarke with the Stewardship Award for 20+ years of effective fiscal management. (PDN 5/11/18)

Third, in the last 3 years, the current board and superintendent have hired all new principals, and have set rigorous performance goals to guide us in our school improvement efforts. (See the CSD board page on the district website.)

Falsely implying that Chimcum High School has poor test scores, Mr. Hogenson asserted that “parents… pulled their kids out of Chimacum schools because 75% of 11th graders failed the state’s Smarter Balance Assessment tests in math during the 2016-17 school year.” Mr. Hogenson neglected to mention that 74% of juniors statewide failed the state math test that year. (Common Core has raised the bar substantially.) In recent years, CHS performance on state tests has hovered around the state average–sometimes just above, sometimes just below. No one is satisfied with that. Chimacum kids need and deserve excellent performance, and everyone at CSD is working hard toward that goal. But Mr. Hogenson is clearly wrong to describe CHS as a “failed school.”

Mr. Hogenson wonders “how many Chimacum High students were allowed to cut math class on March 14 so they could be exploited by the movement to relieve people of their constitutional rights.” The numerical answer is that one-sixth of the student body had a math class scheduled that period, and about half of all students participated in the peaceful and orderly demonstration, so about one-twelfth of CHS students missed less than a half hour of math that day–about 0.3% of the year’s allotted instructional time in the subject.

But none of those students were “exploited.” If Mr. Hogenson saw the next day’s print edition of the PDN, he would have seen a photo of the demonstration, showing a CHS student counterdemonstrator displaying an NRA sign. He might also be interested to learn that in April other CHS students sought and obtained permission to organize an on-campus demonstration in support of gun rights. That second demonstration passed without press coverage, I think because those students did not contact local papers as the organizers of the first demonstration had done.

It is condescending to describe CHS students on either side of the issue as “exploited.” CHS students are thoughtful and rational. Our civics curriculum requires students to consider views across the political spectrum and to weigh evidence in support of competing assertions and positions–in short, to do the work Mr. Hogenson should have done before writing the CSD section of this opinion piece.

CSD will continue to work hard to compete for a shrinking pool of potential students in an aging county with inadequate housing and employment prospects for parents of school-age children. In other contexts, Mr. Hogenson has expressed interest in addressing the county’s economic challenges. I appreciate his efforts on that front, because those challenges are the primary drivers of CSD’s long-term enrollment decline.

I invite Mr. Hogenson to call me at 360.302.5905. I would enjoy an opportunity to show him around CHS, introduce him to our students, share our successes, and demonstrate that CSD constitutes an example of good government in Jefferson County.

DISTRICT 3 COMMISSIONER RACE: JON COOKE ON THE ISSUES

We asked all candidates in the race for the open seat representing District 3 on the Jefferson County Commission the same four questions.  Monday, we published Craig Durgan’s answers.  Today it is Jon Cooke’s turn.

“Growth, Opportunity, Prosperity.”  Jon Cooke frequently uses these words to explain what he believes “GOP” stands for.  Mr. Cooke is chair of the Jefferson County Republican Party and the only Republican in the race.  He has been a teacher and coach, and currently is responsible for maintenance of many Jefferson County public facilities.  You can read his bio by clicking here, courtesy of the Honesty Forum.  Mr. Cooke has been a keen observer of developments affecting life in District 3 and around the county.  We appreciate his thoughtful answers.

1.  What do you see as the most critical need facing District 3 and what specifically will you do to address that need?

The most critical need in District 3 would be a sewer system in District 2.  The sewer system in Port Hadlock would break the way for business development to come to our county.  These businesses would provide jobs and expand the property tax base to increase the revenue of the county – which would provide for better police protection and other services provided by the county.  There are several avenues for implementing the sewer system that are waiting for the re-examination of the overpriced system the county had previously proclaimed.  Once that estimate is in, then we would need to bring all the different ideas to the table and see which one makes the most sense.  This project is a must and as commissioner I would push to see it through and help Commissioner Dean to complete her campaign promise to deliver a sewer system to the voters.

2.  There has been much talk of the need for regulatory reform by all the candidates in order to promote a more prosperous District 3.  Which regulations would you change and how?
The road to real change in Jefferson County starts at the doors of the Department of Community Development.  There are regulations in our building codes that go above state codes.  Those codes could be relaxed to give more opportunities to builders and businesses.  In the Urban Growth Area of Port Hadlock there is a retail building code that limits building size to 20,000 square feet.  Port Hadlock QFC and Hadlock Building Supply are maxed out in square footage.  For any large business to come into the county they will want a larger site than that.  As a commissioner, I would work with Patty Charnes, DCD director, to identify areas that could be relaxed.  The percentage of Jefferson County land for Heavy Industrial now stands at .02%.  We need to provide zoning to increase this where it will have a minimal effect on our rural character.  Also, our rural villages need updates to the water systems supplied to these areas, which would need a commissioner who could work with the PUD commissioners to find solutions.
3.  What should the rest of the county, and Port Townsend in particular, be doing to alleviate the poverty and lack of economic opportunity in District 3?
After attending the Planning Commission meetings for months previous to my decision to run for commissioner, it became clear to me that our leadership has the idea that small businesses should be the economic mainstay of the county.  How has this worked so far?  Unemployment has risen above the state and national levels, young families are leaving our schools, and economic recovery has happened all around us.  Small businesses are vital to any economy, but should not shoulder the whole load.  We need a diversity of business types and sizes to prosper.  Port Townsend was recently voted one of the most beautiful towns on the west coast.  If they want to remain in that mind set, I am fine with that, but they should not hold back the rest of the county from taking advantage of opportunities for economic recovery.  Port Townsend is our only current viable option for large housing areas and they should be helping to alleviate the housing shortage.
4.  What would you like to tell voters about why you should be the next District 3 County Commissioner?
The County’s Unencumbered Fund (funds that are not earmarked for specific areas of spending) of the current budget is above a million dollars.  Budgeted out four years ahead that fund will be down to a little over 100,000 dollars.  Something is not working.  We need some common sense solution to our revenue problems.  Bringing in businesses will broaden our property tax base, so the county will have less of a reason to dig deeper into your tax pocket.  As a leader, I listen to what people say – not to answer them with my solution, but to actually hear their ideas.  We have a lot of intelligent people in our county, but if a commissioner is not truly listening the ideas never take shape.  One man said that he had looked over the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Update and noticed there is no matrix to see if the “goals” are really being met.  As a wrestling coach for over 30 years coaching athletes to set goals, I know that if there are not benchmarks to achieving the goals then they are not goals, but, instead, just dreams.  A lady told me if she wanted to buy clothing she has three options: go to Kitsap or Clallam Counties, buy the overpriced clothes on the Port Townsend water front, or go to Goodwill.  Too many people are choosing the first option.  A retired marine biologist asked why we are not putting pressure on The Department of Fish and Wildlife to open salmon fishing here in May and June.  We are missing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars in tourism spending annually.  The salmon not caught by the tribes and to resupply the fisheries are being ground up for fish meal.  Why not open up our waters again?  If you want a commissioner who will listen to you check out my website at: www.electjoncooke.com.
NEXT UP:  Ryan McAllister, Democrat for District 3 County Commissioner

DISTRICT 3 COMMISSIONER RACE: CRAIG DURGAN ON THE ISSUES

We asked all the candidates running to represent Jefferson County Commission District 3 several questions which highlight the challenges of the position.  We will be running their responses this week.

Craig Durgan is an engineer and it shows in his mastery of the issues he sees as key to tackling District 3’s poverty and lack of economic opportunity.  You can read his extensive biography by clicking here, courtesy of the Honesty Forum.  He is one of the three Democrats running for the open seat.

We posed the same questions to all candidates and they are published verbatim, except when we have to correct a typo here and there.

Tomorrow:  Jon Cooke, the Republican in the race.

Ballots have been mailed for the August 7, 2018 election.  
We appreciate Mr. Durgan’s thoughtful answers.  Here they are:

1.  What do you see as the most critical need facing District 3 and what specifically will you do to address that need?

We need to bring back family wage jobs, affordable housing and broaden the tax base so the county has proper funding. I propose to first build the sewer in Port Hadlock then to do the same in Quilcene and Brinnon, plus install a water system with fire flow for both of the former. Longer term I want to plan for a Major Industrial Development (MID) as per the Growth Management Act (GMA) so small manufacturing companies can have a place to conduct business in Jefferson County. Commensurate with implementation of a MID I will then move to establish land banks as per the GMA for forest related industries to locate here.

2.  There has been much talk of the need for regulatory reform by all the candidates in order to promote a more prosperous District 3.  Which regulations would you change and how?

We need to make both Quilcene and Brinnon into Urban Growth Areas. That will allow smaller building lot sizes within the UGA that will meet State requirements because they will have water and sewer systems. Additionally, many people have stated that the minimum 5 acre lot size is far too great. Since the minimum lot size per State Septic rules is 12,500 square feet if served by public water in Type 2 soils, I would change the land use regulations to reflect that fact. Nowhere in the GMA does it state that there is a minimum lot size. I would reduce the lot sizes to reflect the reality of State Septic rules. All of these regulations are in the Jefferson County Code and can be changed by the Board of County Commissioners quite easily. It is not a requirement to get permission from the Growth Management Hearings Board or the State.

3.  What should the rest of the county, and Port Townsend in particular, be doing to alleviate the poverty and lack of economic opportunity in District 3?
Port Townsend needs to be much more cooperative in growing districts 2 and 3. It is to the City of Port Townsend’s benefit to have a vibrant economy in Jefferson County regardless of whether it is in the City or in the County. In addition they should work with the PUD and county to free up some of the water from the system that they share with the pulp mill. This could be done by working with the mill in a cooperative way to re-use the water more then twice. There are existing water treatment systems that can be installed to do this. The excess water could then be sold to the PUD for use in other areas. This is quite vital for our economy. Water is an important resource and should not be wasted. New technology can be brought to bear to solve many of our issues.
4.  What would you like to tell voters about why you should be the next District 3 County Commissioner?
I am the only candidate with experience in five key areas.
1. I have managed assets worth in excess of $200,000,000. Jefferson County has many assets worth quite a lot of money.
2. I have managed budgets in excess of $10,000,000. It is important to have experience with large budgets.
3. I have developed land in Jefferson County for the last 20 years. So, I am quite familiar with what it takes a business to start in operation here and the land use regulations.
4. I have run a successful business in Jefferson County for over 20 years.
5. I am an engineer by training and understand infrastructure and why it is so vital to our economy.
All these skills are applicable to being a member of the Board of County Commissioners. I believe that my experience will serve the residents of Jefferson County well.
Jefferson County’s Hierarchy of Needs

Jefferson County’s Hierarchy of Needs

Had anyone told me last year that I’d be writing about Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs as it pertains to Jefferson County politics, I would have told them they’re nuts. But having made a passing reference to it a few weeks ago, and having listened to local politicians and community commentators over the past few weeks, I realized I had hit on something.
Abraham Maslow was an American psychologist who left us too soon. He was only 62 when he died in 1970 but he left behind a volume of work that merits the study of scholars in developmental psychology, sociology, and management training to this day. Chief among his theories is his Hierarchy of Needs, which resulted from his research into human motivation and curiosity.
During the course of his research, Maslow identified stages through which humans pass en route to reaching their full potential and what we need to get there. Much of Maslow’s theory laid out the basic things humans need before they can achieve their full potential – self-actualization, as he described it. Some of these needs include self-esteem, social belonging and a measure of safety and security. But the necessary bedrock which precedes all other needs is what Maslow called physiological needs. These are the things necessary to human survival. Without them we fail to function.
Maslow broke down these physiological needs into a handful of necessities: air to breath, water to drink, food to eat, and shelter from the elements, along with sex, sleep and clothing. Once these needs have been achieved, we can move to the next level of Maslow’s hierarchy, which is safety. This involves our personal security, as well as our emotional and financial security, and our health and well being.
One stage in Maslow’s hierarchy leads to the next.  Leapfrogging doesn’t work. It does no good to perceive a sense of social belonging, which Maslow identifies as necessary to self-actualization, if one hasn’t first attained proper shelter and security. It is at this point that we can see a nexus between the needs of human beings as individuals – little different from our cave dwelling ancestors – and the communities we inhabit in the 21st century.
As the contest for the vacant seat on the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners takes shape we can see how candidates are applying Maslow’s theory, and whether they are applying it properly or improperly, particularly on the issue of infrastructure. Democrat Craig Durgan and Republican Jon Cooke are pounding the podium for sewer services in Port Hadlock and other areas of the county, while Democrats Greg Brotherton and Ryan McAllister are expending more time extolling the virtues of high-speed Internet.
Maslow would probably say both are good things, just as he said shelter and acceptance into social settings are good things. But he was quite specific in determining which must precede which. That is the question for Jefferson County voters in choosing among candidates.
Just as with individuals, the goal of reaching full potential can also be charted among communities through Maslow’s Hierarchy. Before Jefferson County can achieve its full potential, it must maneuver through the stages of Maslow’s theory, demonstrated by how it conducts itself as a civil society. We must first establish a foundation for the civic equivalent of physiological and safety needs, followed by fulfillment of social belonging and esteem before reaching that stage of self-actualization – Jefferson County’s full potential.
Jefferson County has largely met the physiological needs of its citizens but can the same be said for safety and financial security? It’s an open question depending on where one lives. But ask the storekeeper or restaurateur in Port Hadlock, or the landowner wanting to build apartments to provide much needed rental housing: does reaching financial security and their full potential depend more on their Internet service or their sewer service? You’ll likely find greater need for the latter than the former.
As we contemplate the contenders for the Board of County Commissioners we would do well to consider Jefferson County’s Hierarchy of Needs and which candidates are prepared to meet them. There are no shortcuts to self-actualization and anyone who claims otherwise is ignoring the settled science of Abraham Maslow.
Pressure Mounts for Action on Hadlock Sewer

Pressure Mounts for Action on Hadlock Sewer

77% of Landowners Petition Jefferson County Commission

Landowners representing 77% of the areas of Port Hadlock zoned for commercial, industrial and multi-family units on June 18, 2018, delivered to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners their petition for action on the long-delayed sewer project.
Their petition requests that the BOCC “investigate the cost and feasibility of building a sewer in the Port Hadlock UGA” to serve the areas zoned for those uses.  More significantly, the petition states the landowners’ interest in forming a Local Improvement District to permit financing of the sewer.  An LID would spread the cost of the sewer among the covered landowners over a set number of years.
The signatories represent 200.91 acres of the 260.75 acres in those areas.  Only 1 landowner submitted a dissenting statement.  He owns only about a third of an acre.
According to one of the signatories, who requested that their name not be printed, representatives of the landowners group have held two meetings with county staff with one commissioner present.  As a result of those meetings, the county has contracted for a cost study of the Hadlock system using the grinder pump collection and membrane bio-reactor treatment contained in a plan for a wastewater system in Quilcene.  This technology could possibly cut the cost of the Hadlock sewer in half.  Using technology that is decades old, the cost of the Hadlock sewer is estimated at about $45 million.
Land for a sewer plant has been acquired and the county says the project is “shovel ready.”  $13.4 million of the necessary funding has been secured.
Since 2008, the Jefferson County Port Hadlock UGA Sewer Facility Plan has recommended establishment of an LID.
Attached to the petitions were letters from the Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding and the Old Alcohol Plant.  They did not sign the petition but submitted supporting statements.
David Blessing, President of the Board of Directors, wrote, “The Boat School recognizes there is a problem with septic capacity for commercial and multiple home sites which prevents expansion and economic growth in Port Hadlock…. We strongly believe it is in the county’s best interests to build such a sewer system.”
Blessing pointed to a problem confronting many Hadlock businesses.  They must maintain, upgrade and/or expand existing septic systems to continue operations, while they call for construction of the sewer.  The Valley Tavern, for instance, recently did substantial work on its septic system at considerable cost.  Nonetheless, it’s owner signed onto the petition  The Boat School is moving forward with expansion of its existing system, precluding it from immediately joining an LID, though it may be interested “down the road.”
Gary Kiester, managing partner of the Old Alcohol Plant, wrote that his organization recognizes “the immediate need to investigate the feasibility” of a sewer to serve commercial, industrial and multi-family zoned properties.  “Delays in moving forward on this crucial project will only increase costs…. The project will not only improve…land value[s] but will generate additional and needed revenue to the county through permitting, job creation and moderately priced homes…. We see no downside in moving this forward convincingly.”
Kiester added that his company wants to build an additional five-story hotel that could increase the capability of its major tenant, Bayside Housing, which houses and transitions the homeless into permanent housing.  The new construction would also “provide additional rooms for low income seniors.”  Due to the limitations on their septic drain field, however, the construction cannot proceed.
Kiester closed by stating that once costs are determined “we would happily sign on to a form a Local Improvement District….”
With the addition of the 11 acres owned between the Boat School and the Old Alcohol Plant the percentage of land owners in the affected area calling for the new cost study and endorsing an LID exceeds 81%.
In our next report, we will examine another sewage treatment technology that could greatly reduce the cost and construction time of the Hadlock system.
See our related report:  Glimmers of Hope for the Hadlock Sewer, which examines brightening prospects for federal infrastructure funding.
Here is the full Quilcene Wastewater Facility Study, prepared by Tetra Tech of Seattle for the Port of Port Townsend, which spearheaded the investigation.