First Responders Show “Unprecedented” Support for Sheriff Nole’s Re-election; Frank Responds

First Responders Show “Unprecedented” Support for Sheriff Nole’s Re-election;
Frank Responds

Jefferson County’s Sheriff deputies, its captain and all its sergeants, all of the correctional staff and the firefighters have endorsed the re-election of Sheriff Joe Nole.

“I’ve never seen this much support over an election before,” says JCSO Sergeant Brandon Przygocki, who has worked in law enforcement in Jefferson County for the past 16 years. “[T]he entire department is in support of Sheriff Nole’s re-election. Every union within the JCSO unanimously voted to endorse him.” Art Frank, Nole’s opponent, a JCSO detective, did not vote on the endorsement.

We quote at length these endorsements because (1) this level of widespread, unanimous support from first responders is, as Sergeant Przygocki says, truly unprecedented in a sheriff election; (2) the letters of endorsement provide inside information not well known to the general public; and (3) Mr. Frank has provided a quite lengthy response (it is our policy to print in full and verbatim all statements sent to us in writing). The complete letters of endorsement may be read at Nole’s campaign website. 

Firefighters for Nole

Local 2032, East Jefferson Professional Firefighters, has joined law enforcement in calling for Nole’s re-election. In an open letter the firefighters stated:

For the entirety of Joe Nole’s time as Sheriff, we have experienced a professional and collaborative relationship with his officers, which is indicative of his strong relationship. He has established a culture built around serving the community he is charged to protect, and operating as an equal partner with Fire and EMS. This level of cooperation between public entities is not always common and should not be taken for granted

The Firefighters endorsed Nole in his campaign to unseat then-incumbent Sheriff Dave Stanko in 2018. “Your local firefighters feel safer with Joe Nole as Sheriff, and for the second time we are honored to strongly endorse” his re-election. This endorsement is noteworthy as Frank, while working in the Sheriff’s Department as a Detective, is a firefighter and Board Chair of the Quilcene Fire Department (Marcia Kelbon, who is running for the District 3 County Commission seat is also on the Board of the Quilcene Fire Department). Brinnon’s Fire Chief, Tim Manly, has also endorsed Nole’s re-election.

Correctional and Animal Control Staff for Nole

In their endorsement of Nole’s re-election, The Corrections, Civil and Animal Control Guild, wrote about Nole’s work on a side of law enforcement only those incarcerated or working in the jail may ever see:

[Sheriff Nole] has professionally guided the Sheriff’s Office through protests, defunding the police debates, police reform laws and unprecedented times with the Covid-19 pandemic. By its very nature, the jail was one of the most at-risk within in the County in dealing with Covid. With Sheriff Nole’s hands on leadership, we were able to not only weather the pandemic but thrive, by improving operations and equipment to better ensure safety for the staff and inmates we are charged with caring for. Sheriff Nole worked to revitalize the nearly defunct Animal Control Program by hiring a full time Animal Control Deputy. This has allowed for more time…responding to citizen animal complaints and investigating potential crimes against animals….  It has led to a successful prosecution of, and rescue of several animals from a prolific animal abuser…. Sheriff Nole understands the challenges law enforcement and the community face with substance abuse addiction and behavioral health and has been highly supportive of the Residential Treatment Program now provided to inmates. He also regularly attends Behavioral Health Court, engaging directly with and encouraging participants, and providing guidance to help make the program continuously successful.”

Deputies for Nole

The letter of endorsement from the Deputies Union stated:

Sheriff Nole has grown and repaired relationships within the community allowing for more collaborative criminal investigations….[He] has restored morale through support, communications and training. Washington State recently experienced one of the most widespread and cumbersome law enforcement reform seen in decades. Sheriff Nole was able to navigate the Department through these changes through a collaborative approach, reducing stress among our staff.  Sheriff Nole has been a quality manager and leader, always leading by example and entrusting his Command Staff to supervise, teach and train deputies to be quality law enforcement officers of this community.

Command Staff for Nole

The letter of unanimous endorsement from the JCSO Command Staff (captain and four sergeants) lauded Nole for “adding body cameras to invest in community trust” and bringing aboard a mental health navigator. The five men signing the letter relate that they have, combined, more than 100 years of law enforcement experience. They have worked under a number of sheriffs, emphasizing:

Sheriff Nole’s ability to communicate with humility and respect, regardless of rank or status, is the cornerstone of his success.

They added, as have deputies, that these qualities set Nole apart from his opponent.

 

Art Frank’s Response

Mr. Frank provided the following statement in response to the Free Press asking for comment on the first responder endorsements of Sheriff Nole’s re-election:

 

I appreciate the Free Press offering me the opportunity to comment on first responder union endorsements of my opponent in the sheriff’s race. I wish the first responder unions had offered me a fair opportunity to earn their endorsement; if they had done so, the outcome might have been different. They failed to communicate and instead made endorsements without all the facts. And then shared that endorsement with the public. That was unfair on so many levels.

Normally, before endorsing candidates in local races, unions invite both candidates to make their case, enabling members to make a fully informed endorsement.

When unions fail to give both candidates an equal opportunity to earn their endorsement, that failure can produce endorsements based on lack of information, false assumptions, rumors, misinformation, disinformation, uninformed prejudice, unreasonable fear, and/or unreflective groupthink.

That is what happened here.

None of the 3 unions representing Jefferson County Sheriff Office staff gave me an opportunity to earn their endorsement or even share my vision for the future. And I work side by side with them every day. All 3 units—command, corrections, and deputies—endorsed Joe Nole without ever inviting me to make the case for my candidacy.

As a member of the deputies’ union, I found their failure to extend that basic courtesy very puzzling and disappointing. If one of my union brothers were running for public office, I would feel bound by solidarity and fairness to give him a respectful hearing and a reasonable chance to earn our endorsement.

East Jefferson Fire & Rescue’s union was also prepared to endorse without hearing from me. However, when I requested an opportunity to address them, the union gave me far less time (15 minutes) than they gave my opponent (more than an hour). No one ever explained that disparity, though I remain grateful for the time EJFR’s union gave me.

I’ve worked shoulder to shoulder with Jefferson County first responders since 2013. I’ve witnessed the individual courage and character, sacrifice and dedication of JCSO and EJFR personnel, and they have seen mine. They are my brothers and sisters, and they have my respect.

However, even excellent individuals make mistakes when deprived of adequate information. The first responder unions endorsed my opponent based on incomplete and faulty information. They easily could have avoided that error simply by granting both candidates an equal opportunity to earn their endorsements, asking tough questions, listening critically, and weighing all available evidence to make the best decision—skills we practice every day as law enforcement officers.

These flawed endorsements are unworthy of our county’s first responders.

Good leadership makes groups greater than the sum of their parts.

Conversely, poor leadership degrades and diminishes, making a group less than the sum of its parts.

This is true specifically of the process that produced these endorsements, and it is also generally true of JCSO under the current sheriff.

My brothers in JCSO deserve a leader who will bring out the best in them, enabling us to protect and serve the public more faithfully and effectively. This is why I felt duty-bound to run for sheriff.

In the paragraphs that follow, I shall…

  1. Make the positive case for my candidacy the unions would have heard if they had given me a fair hearing

  2. Surface ethical and factual issues with their endorsement letters

  3. Detail the unions’ flawed endorsement processes

I. The Positive Case for Art for Sheriff

JCSO needs better leadership at the top, both to improve public safety and to improve working conditions for our employees.

I’m running to support JCSO staff. For the last 7 years, I have heard concerns from many colleagues about how the department is run, and how they are treated (including during contract negotiations). I am determined to respond to and resolve those concerns. As sheriff, I will advocate for the entire staff. I know that good leadership and good morale can and should go together. My mission Respond and Resolve is supported by three pillars, the second of which is an inspired, motivated, and appreciated staff: a well-trained and properly equipped team whose members are valued and motivated to support the mission.

As sheriff, I will evaluate and modify staff scheduling and assignments to meet both community needs and the needs of our deputies and their families. These alternatives will ensure officers won’t have to work weekends for years on end, and allow deputies who prefer working nights to stay on nights. This would enable deputies to diversify their work experience, for example by staying on days to focus on investigations, juvenile cases, or detective assignments. Alternative patrol schedules would enable deputies to balance work and family obligations, while ensuring proper deployment and coverage for our communities.

Effective law enforcement requires effective supervision. Currently we only have two ranks for patrol staff: deputy and sergeant.  We have 17 deputies (including detectives) and five command staff. Deputies often must wait many years for an opportunity to advance to sergeant, which can be demoralizing.

With only five command staff, our current schedules leave holes where there is no supervisor on duty 4 hours out of every day. And it can be more than 4 hours when supervisors are not on duty due to scheduled leave, illness, training, or other absences.

These daily periods of supervisor unavailability directly endanger public safety. For example, the state’s new pursuit law requires immediate supervisor authorization to initiate pursuit of a suspect, which is literally impossible when there is no supervisor on duty. Similarly, a use of force requires swift supervisory follow-up—which is often delayed when supervisors are unavailable. This supervisor follow up provides proper documentation of the incident and protects the rights and interests of the deputy and the involved citizen.

As sheriff, I will solve this problem by providing more consistent 24/7 supervisor coverage. We will do this by promoting two or more deputies to a new senior deputy or corporal rank.

This new rank will improve retention by providing new professional advancement opportunities for deputies. It will also ensure we always have at least two senior deputies gaining supervisory experience and readiness to step up to higher leadership positions.

As sheriff, I will improve JCSO’s ability to respond to threats like active shooter events. This will require tactical training and equipment for all law enforcement officers—not just a select few. As a small, rural department, we cannot continue to rely on a small, dedicated team of deputies receiving basic tactical training. We must train all officers to a competent level so every one of us can deal with whatever may confront us, because in many cases, we cannot afford to wait for backup. Vital tactical equipment priorities include modern ballistic helmets, hearing protection/communication headsets, and additional, improved body armor (rifle plates and carriers).

As sheriff, I will improve job satisfaction by refocusing JSCO on our core mission. All of us became law enforcement officers in the first place to protect and serve the public. We are all sickened to know JCSO fails to respond to and resolve some 911 calls—and we don’t even know how many because the current sheriff fails to track this data. None of us feel good about lapses in evidence collection and handling—lapses that make prosecution of suspects more difficult than it should be.

When I am sheriff, we will respond to and resolve all 911 calls, and reform our evidence collection and handling in compliance with accreditation standards of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC).

As sheriff, I will lead the development of clear, specific job performance expectations so every deputy has a clear, measurable road map to professional growth. The current sheriff has failed us. He has failed to set clear expectations, failed to provide proper training, and failed to provide performance measures to drive individual and agency-wide improvement.

As sheriff, I will re-evaluate working conditions for our corrections officers, and work with them to improve those conditions, provide stronger support, ensure full staffing, enhance long-term job satisfaction, increase retention, and reduce turnover.

As sheriff, I will improve public relations, communicating early and often with communities in our county to hear and resolve their concerns, while building citizen support for JCSO’s efforts.

As sheriff, I will strongly advocate for better county, state and federal policies to support us in our work. I will educate the public and elected leaders on the realities of being a law enforcement officer in today’s world. In collaboration with other justice system leaders, I will ensure county leaders, state legislators, and members of Congress receive the benefit of local subject matter experts so our elected representatives enact policies that empower law enforcement to provide public safety in the best interests of our communities.

As sheriff, I will build partnerships with local school districts to improve school safety. We will work with educators, parents, and community members to develop plans for emergency response, disaster preparedness, and preventing and countering intruder events.

Despite the current sheriff’s lack of leadership, Undersheriff Pernsteiner has worked hard to keep JCSO functioning. When I chose to run, I told Andy I would invite him to remain as undersheriff, and that remains my plan. Over more than 25 years in JCSO, Andy has built strong relationships with our staff. Like me, he genuinely cares about every employee, and is determined to support them in providing excellent public safety. I am confident we can work together to provide the leadership JCSO and our communities need and deserve.

II. Ethical and Factual Issues in the Unions’ Endorsement Letters

The endorsement letters issued by all 3 JCSO bargaining units violated JCSO policy by including the names of the signatories without an appropriate disclaimer. As stated in Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office Policy Manual section 1030.4.1: Unauthorized Endorsements and Advertisements, “when it can reasonably be construed that an employee, acting in his/her individual capacity or through an outside group or organization (e.g. bargaining group), is affiliated with this department, the employee shall give a specific disclaiming statement that any such speech or expression is not representative of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office.”

This is a minor point, but the deputies’ union endorsement letter claimed their endorsement of Nole was unanimous, and that is technically false. I’m a member of the deputies’ union, and I haven’t endorsed Joe.

The command staff endorsement falsely equates my leadership with that of a former sheriff, Dave Stanko, citing what they experienced as a lack of communication, listening, trust, humility, respect, and inclusiveness. As Stanko’s undersheriff, I did my duty by executing the sheriff’s directives to the best of my ability in service to JCSO and the community. Without being insubordinate in that role, I could not then articulate my differences with and reservations about Stanko’s leadership. I can do so now: I thought Stanko tried to do too much too soon. I advocated at the time for him to slow down to avoid alienating deputies, and in some instances he listened. When he did not, I did my best to provide a buffer between Stanko’s expectations and the practical needs of our deputies and community.

For the last four years, I’ve worked as a deputy and detective, and my evaluations show I am a team player and “invaluable contributor” who communicates well, provides leadership, and has earned the respect of my peers. (You can review Andy Pernsteiner and Brett Anglin’s evaluations of my performance for yourself, as I’ve posted them at art4sheriff.net) When it comes to trust, my colleagues trust me to negotiate their contract, benefits, and working conditions as a shop steward for the deputies’ union.

The bottom line is that I’m running in this race as Art Frank -– not Dave Stanko. As sheriff I will lead JCSO as Art Frank -– not Dave Stanko. If you want to know how I will lead, review my evaluations, look at how I do my job every day, and review what I wrote above in section I of this document.

III. Flaws in the Unions’ Endorsement Processes

Deputies’ Union Endorsement

I regret that my own union did not invite me to address them about why I am running and my plans for the office. Nor did any of my union colleagues contact me outside of work to ask.

On June 9, Detective Allen emailed deputies’ union members the link to an anonymous Survey Monkey poll to endorse either Joe or me for sheriff. There was no union meeting called to authorize the poll or to invite candidates to address the union.

The Survey Monkey poll was open for one week. The link could be forwarded to anyone, and anyone could open the link and vote. Because it was anonymous, there was no way to track who had voted. It was possible to vote more than once. I did not participate, because I did not believe the process was fair, as I had no opportunity to address the membership.

Detective Allen’s email announcing the poll said that the results would be released once it was concluded. I never received an email or other communication with the result, though I was able to deduce it when my opponent posted the endorsement letter on his website.

Command Staff endorsement

The command staff union—comprised of four sergeants and one captain—was the first to endorse my opponent. Unfortunately, they did not invite me to speak to them first about why I am running or my vision for the future of the office, nor did any of the individual members contact me outside of work to ask.

Endorsement of Jail Staff Union

Like the other unions, the corrections staff union issued an endorsement without inviting me to address the members, and without any member ever asking me why I was running.

East Jefferson Fire and Rescue Endorsement

In June, my campaign requested an opportunity to address EJFR’s union. They gave me 15 minute to present at a meeting in mid-July. At some point before that, the union spent more than an hour with my opponent. Despite the time disparity, I remain grateful for the opportunity to make my case.

Conclusion

Thank you for reading, and thanks to the Free Press for giving me the opportunity to set the record straight. I am determined to earn your vote, and welcome your questions in any format. I can be reached through my website, art4sheriff.net

Tragic Toll of Suicides and Fatal Overdoses in Jefferson County

Tragic Toll of Suicides and Fatal Overdoses in Jefferson County

Suicide and substance abuse touch all our lives. These horrors and tragedies surround us.

In my eight years in this town, I have personally known one young man who hanged himself, and I’m friends with people whose relatives have taken their lives in what should have been their prime years.

I found one suicide victim, a man who had veered off the road intentionally to collide with a tree. I won’t forget opening that crumpled door, feeling for the pulse that wasn’t there and saying a prayer as I awaited the emergency services response. First responders and loved ones and friends found the other suicides and those who died by overdose.

I helped with the funeral service for the young man who hung himself outside Manresa Castle. He had a severe opiate addiction. He was living at the Mill Road transient camp, as it was then known (now called the Caswell-Brown camp after two people found dead in our community.) About 200 mostly young people attended that service.

The young man’s drug dealer was stopped at the door to the church because he attempted to smuggle in a small dog under his shirt. He was there to score, not mourn. Having just been released from jail, he didn’t have any of his own dope. According to a substance abuse expert who was in attendance, about half of the 200 people were addicts. Some had come drunk, and I found an empty vodka fifth in a waste can. Others were high. As I was closing up that evening I noticed two cars parked at the very edge of the church property. I almost tapped on a window but stopped when I saw people inside shooting up.

A funeral for an addict who had died by his own hand or overdose was sadly nothing new. I wonder how many of those troubled souls have since overdosed and/or contemplated or attempted suicide.

Our community’s hidden suffering, hopelessness and despair is expressed in these deaths. Yet the question of whether Lombardy poplars should be felled draws more attention and passion than these tragedies. Trees along Sims Way have been given names; the suicides and overdose fatalities are nameless to the general public.

Maybe in rarefied circles in this community some can claim they have no personal connection with anyone or any family that has lost someone to despair and drugs. I don’t believe them, any more than the city council member who told me he has no one in his family or circle of friends suffering from addiction.

A death like that of Jarrod Bramson, the popular musician whose death was attributed to homicide by his drug dealer, is not far removed from the category of suicide or fatal overdose. It was a fatal overdose, just not administered by Jarrod himself. Maybe it can be considered assisted suicide. Isn’t that descending spiral of addiction and substance abuse little more than a slow suicide? Are not every one of of the dealers handing out Fentanyl pills assisting suicide?

County Prosecutor James Kennedy’s office has provided at my request what is a colorless inventory of suicides and fatal overdoses in Jefferson County. The identities of the deceased are shielded according to state law. Those tables are found below.

Suicides in Jefferson County 2003 to Present
(click here for full table)

Partial screen shot of information complied by Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney Office at Port Townsend Free Press request.

Fatal Overdoses, Jefferson County, 2019 to Present
(click here for full table)

Partial screen shot of information complied by Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney Office at Port Townsend Free Press request.

 

Prosecutor Kennedy writes,

“[T]he true picture is murkier than the numbers. For example, it is not uncommon to come across a person who has committed suicide, by gun shot or hanging, for example, where drug (and/or alcohol) paraphernalia is present. We usually test the decedent’s blood for drugs in those cases and the results are almost always positive. We typically classify these deaths as a suicide even though drugs clearly played a significant role in the death.”

Kennedy continues,

“Other times we have come across long term drug users who die after having ingested a significantly higher amount of drugs than they typically use. What they ‘typically’ use is often hard to pin down with certainty — if available it comes anecdotally from acquaintances — but the inference remains that this was a suicide by drug overdose. However, since we cannot be certain, we usually classify these deaths as we would an overdose, unless there is other indicia present like a suicide note.”

Victoria Brown, age 23, is in these tables. She died of an overdose in the lawless transient camp the County Commission permitted to fester for more than a year at the Fairgrounds. The transient camp on Mill Road that the county has established with OlyCAP is named after her, as well as John Caswell. He died during the heat wave in 2021. I am friends with the man who had tried to help him that day and later found him dead by a picnic table off Sims Way.

Caswell’s death cannot be detached from his substance abuse. He had been drinking alcohol in the oppressive heat, and help had been sought at the hospital to cool him down. The hospital put him back on the street. He was scheduled to enter alcohol treatment in a couple of days. In the meantime, he had to stay “balanced” (as chronic drinkers call it) to fight off shakes, withdrawal and DTs. Is his death a fatal overdose and/or a suicide?

How many other deaths need to be added to these tables? How many suicides have been attempted, how many overdoses have been reversed just short of death? (About thirty 10th and 12th graders report attempting suicide in the past year, according to the 2021 Healthy Youth Survey, on which Port Townsend Free Press reported.)

Prosecutor Kennedy has suggested running down further information from law enforcement and emergency services, saying “this is a really important issue. Thank you for paying attention to it.” I will be seeking to obtain further information on our county’s attempted suicides and non-fatal overdoses for a future report.

Jeffco High Schoolers Depressed, Hopeless, Suicidal: 2021 Healthy Youth Survey Results Released

Jeffco High Schoolers Depressed, Hopeless, Suicidal:
2021 Healthy Youth Survey Results Released

Twenty-five percent of Jefferson County high schoolers made a plan to kill themselves in the last year. About 30 tenth and twelfth graders tried to kill themselves.

These and other alarming reports of severe mental health problems among the county’s high schoolers were released as part of the 2021 Healthy Youth Survey conducted by the Washington Department of Health. 354 Jefferson County students participated in the study, which also covers all counties statewide.

Our county’s youth report crushing hopelessness. 36% of tenth graders reported feeling so sad or hopeless that they stopped doing their usual activities. That pall of debilitating malaise rose to 44% among 12th graders. The DOH’s statewide results show that youth sensing no or only slight hope are twice as likely to consider suicide as youth with a moderate to high sense of hope.

83% of 12th graders reported feeling nervous or anxious in the two weeks preceding the survey, and 71% of them were unable to stop worrying in that time period. The numbers for 10th graders are only insignificantly better.

Among 12th graders, 26% reported (24 students) considering suicide during the year, 10% (9 students) reported making a suicide plan, 8% (7-8 students) reported attempting suicide. Among 10th graders, 21% (30 students) reported considering suicide, 25% (36 students) made a suicide plan, and 13% (19 students) reported attempting suicide.

Statewide, according to DOH, substance abuse reporting is down over 2018, but mental health problems are more widespread and severe. The 2021 survey found that statewide 74% of 10th graders reported feeling nervous, anxious, on edge, or not being able to stop or control worrying, 20% reported they seriously considered attempting suicide, 16% reported they made a suicide plan, and 8% reported they attempted suicide in the past 12 months. The rates for planning and attempting suicide by 10th graders are higher in Jefferson County. Jefferson County 12th graders reported considering suicide and attempting suicide also at rates higher than the comparable state rates.

Readers are encouraged to read the Fact Sheets from the survey for Jefferson County high schoolers. Much more data, some broken down by demographics, is available. You may use this link:  Healthy Youth Survey 2021. Click on the Fact Sheets link at the top of the page, then select “county” and pull down Jefferson County. From there you can access many fact sheets on mental health, substance abuse and other indicia of teen health. The 134 pages of survey results cover 6th, 8th, 10th and 12th graders.

Dozens of graphs in the Healthy Youth Survey 2021 show detailed analyses of mental health indicators, substance abuse and other well-being factors in our community. This breakdown shows a higher incidence of bullying experienced in Jefferson County as compared to Washington State, at every grade level.

Suicide is the second leading cause of death for Washington teens 15-19 years old, the survey explained, and most youth suicides occur at home.  Suicide attempts among children even as young as 9 years old is on the rise. As reported by Hannah Furfaro, a Seattle Times mental health reporter:

“A pair of new national research studies and Washington data help confirm what Marshall and many others are seeing in hospitals across the Pacific Northwest. Use of medications or other poisons to attempt suicide or self-harm are rising among youths as young as 9, and the largest increases are among those ages 10-12. The number of kids in that age group who ingested some type of poisonous medication or other substance to attempt suicide increased by 4.5 times from 2000 to 2020, according to one of the national studies, published in JAMA Pediatrics in March, compared to a 2.4-fold increase among older adolescents.”

The 2021 survey found a slight decrease in drug use that may only be temporary. According to Dr. Maayan Simckes, an epidemiologist with the Washington Department of Health, drug use could well increase as teens go back to more normal lives, which involves being able to gather with peers, and potentially partying.

Jefferson County’s Board of Health Response and Action

The 2021 data is nothing new. At its April 2019 meeting, Dr. Tom Locke, then the public health officer, told the Jefferson County Board of Health that the 2018 Healthy Youth Survey results “showed concerning findings in the youth mental health category.” At the following month’s meeting, team members from the Substance Abuse Prevention Program at the Health Department were supposed to provide “a more in depth look at the data from the Healthy Youth Survey.” (Reporting on substance abuse among high schoolers was also cause for concern.)

The Board of Health never returned to the mental health crisis among Jefferson County high schoolers. Instead of considering data that was supposed to be provided by the Substance Abuse Prevention Program, the Board spent its meeting time discussing nuclear disarmament. In the past three-plus years since the county’s public health officer informed the Board of Health of “concerning findings” about youth mental health, the subject has never been an agenda item. The 2021 Healthy Youth Survey results were released in March of this year but have not been discussed by the Board of Health.

The members of the Board of Health are County Commissioners Greg Brotherton, Heidi Eisenhour and Kate Dean; Libby Wennstrom, Port Townsend City Council Member; Kees Kolff, Public Hospital District Commissioner; Sheila Westerman, Citizen-at-Large; and Denis Stearns, Citizen-at-Large.

Things That Took Less Than Five Years to Build

Things That Took Less Than Five Years to Build

Above is a glowing view of San Francisco’s gorgeous Golden Gate Bridge, constructed in under 5 years from 1/5/1933 to 5/28/1937.

What other architectural wonders took less than 5 years to build? A Free Press reader sent us the following list. (Note: The Cherry Street Project is not on this list.)

The Empire State Building, built in 11 months, 3/17/1930-5/1/1931

The Hoover Dam, constructed 4/20/1931-3/1/1936

The Eiffel Tower, constructed 1/1887-3/31/1888

Seattle Space Needle, finished in about 400 days on 4/20/1962

The Pentagon, constructed 9/11/1941-1/14/1943

Disneyland, 1/16/1954-7/17/1955

Transcontinental Canadian Railroad, constructed 1881-1885

The Sears-Willis Tower, built 1970-73

And the tallest building in America since the Sears-Willis Tower was built fast and steadily enough that the Chicago Tribune captured a time-lapse movie of its 2005-2009 construction:

All these marvels got completed in less time than the Cherry Street Project – a rehab of an existing 5,000 sq.ft. building that has been blighting our fair town for 5 years (and counting).

Related: Unhappy Birthday: Cherry Street Project Turns Five Years Old

Unhappy Birthday: Cherry Street Project Turns Five Years Old

Unhappy Birthday: Cherry Street Project Turns Five Years Old

Port Townsend’s most ambitious, costliest “affordable” housing project. Barged from Victoria, B.C. the Carmel House, the building at the center of the Cherry Street Project, sits empty and blighted above PT’s golf course. The 2022 work plan for the City of Port Townsend includes no work on the Cherry Street Project except paying down the $1.4 million indebtedness the city incurred to get the thing rehabilitated. The building has been vandalized and is home to rats and raccoons.

The lessons of this abject failure run throughout our coverage since 2018. The first lesson is, simply, don’t believe what you read in The Leader. From the beginning, the newspaper “of record” has done nothing but act as a stenographer for city leaders and activists. It has been a willing participant in every PR effort to put lipstick on this pig. The Leader has never reported the true cost of this boondoggle, or any of its many failures.

Its most frequent tack was to proclaim “Progress!” even when failure was painfully clear to everyone. The Leader has never asked a hard question of the city or the housing activists — the former Homeward Bound Community Land Trust, recently rebranded as Olympic Housing Trust — who defaulted and wasted millions of dollars in public largesse. The Leader has never looked behind the candied words of the project’s backers, nor dug into public records that show taxpayers have been misled and lied to. Instead, the Free Press has done the work our city’s newspaper should have been doing.

The second lesson is in the dysfunction of an ideologically and politically homogeneous legislative body that operates by peer pressure and virtue signaling. The ultimate failure of this project was evident from the beginning. The city failed to inspect the building before purchasing and floating it across international borders.

Lo and behold, there was a Canadian hazardous materials inspection detailing the presence of asbestos and lead paint the city never saw until a couple years later. The project never could “pencil out” as a viable affordable housing project — not that numbers, which represent taxpayer dollars, seemed to matter to council members. It was more important to make a show of doing something grandiose and kind of artsy about affordable housing than it was to crunch numbers with an eye to reality.

Most shocking of all, the city’s own pro forma for the large loan it extended to the activists showed they would default in a couple years. Council shushed up the lone council member who noticed that and rushed the loan through. By the way, we found and reported that the loan contained a $400,000 hidden interest subsidy that was to be shouldered by taxpayers.

How could an unavoidable, predicted default not matter to City Council? That leads to lesson number three, the antidote to the problem observed as lesson number two.

There must be real diversity in a legislative body to make it work. The City Council that saddled taxpayers with the Cherry Street Project all came from the same political and ideological petri dish. They were a clique of the elite and the woke. It was more important to them to get along, reinforce a narrative, repeat feel-good/look-good buzz words, and nod in agreement than it was to get things right. Someone strong who stood outside the clique and didn’t seek their approval and friendship was needed on council to fight their headlong rush into failure.

The fourth lesson is that Port Townsend Free Press was needed back in April 2017 when council rushed into the Cherry Street Project by buying the Carmel House sight unseen. At least we’ve been hounding this story since we launched in May 2018 with our first article focusing on Cherry Street. Now taxpayers know the ride that has been their misfortune (there’s 17 years left on the bond that funded the defaulted loan, so the ride’s not done).

According to The Leader‘s uncritical reporting, the Cherry Street Project was to have been finished and occupied in the Fall of 2017 with a renovation price tag of only a couple hundred thousand dollars. We did the first of many public records requests and dug into the financial documents to get the real story, published May 28, 2018, just a little after the Cherry Street Project’s first birthday:  “Cherry Street “Affordable” Housing to Cost More than $2 Million.” The latest cost estimates put the total cost of the project above $3 million. With the spike in construction costs, count on the price tag being higher today and in the future.

Still a mystery is why the city turned down a $1 million cash offer in September 2020 to bail them out of this mess. Not one city council member ever publicly raised a question about why the city manager gave the back of his hand to Keith and Jean Marzan when they offered to take the mess off the city’s hands and actually build some affordable housing on the site.

The Leader‘s last article on Port Townsend’s hugely disastrous, most expensive, most ambitious affordable housing project was October 1, 2020, when it proclaimed that “Port Townsend will forge ahead with the troubled Cherry Street Project, but with a new nonprofit partner.” The paper accommodated the city’s need for some positive spin on the heels of the activists’ default on their generous loan.

Since that rosy proclamation by The Leader, the only work on the project has been repairing some of the vandalism when teenagers launched a refrigerator through a window and broke out almost all the glass in the blighted 1950s asbestos-and-lead contaminated derelict. Oh, and putting up some fake “this site under video surveillance” signs.

Here is the full list of our reporting on the Cherry Street Project since our first article:

The Tragedy of the Cherry Street Project, 12/12/18

What’s Happening With the Cherry Street Project? 10/29/19

“Completely Bogus” Numbers–More Problems and Delays for Cherry Street Project, 12/2/19

Multi-Million Dollar Fraud on Taxpayers: The Cherry Street Project Unmasked, 6/27/20

Cherry Street Welcomes First Tenants, 2/28/20

Default the Cherry Street Project Now, 4/22/20

Latest Cherry Street Giveaway Hits Taxpayers Harder, 10/2/20

Cherry Street Project Handover “Not a Done Deal,”10/19/20

Accomplished Developer Will Donate Time and Services for Cherry Street Project, 10/20/20

Cherry Street Handover: Red Flags About Bayside Housing, 3/3/21 (and related articles)

Happy Fourth Birthday, Cherry Street Project! 5/10/21

Cherry Street Project Costs Soar in Bayside Housing Proposal, 6/23/21

New Majority on Council Should Kill the Cherry Street Project, 11/27/21

Cherry Street Project Vandalized, 1/4/22

“Incredibly Expensive” Housing Project Follows Cherry Street Debacle, 1/6/22

Mayor Faber (Almost) Opens Up on Cherry Street Project Failure, 4/23/22