Death by Injection?

Why half of America—including healthcare professionals—are refusing the experimental Covid-19 shots

Part Two

by | Apr 6, 2021 | General | 17 comments

“Gene based vaccines have never been used on humans before.
So what we’re witnessing now are human experiments… Auto-immune disease can be triggered by these gene-based vaccines… all have rather severe side effects…
You have to be very, very careful that the vaccine is not killing the elderly with pre-existing conditions instead of protecting them.”

Sucharit Bhakdi, MD,
award-winning virologist and most cited microbiologist in German academic history 

———————————

In Part One of this series, we looked at the mass casualties occurring where Covid-19 vaccine campaigns are underway—injuries and deaths that are being ignored, downplayed or denied outright in a tightly-controlled narrative. 

Since last week, total reports to VAERS of deaths from the experimental injections increased from 2,050 to 2,249. Reports of adverse events increased from 44,606 to 50,861 There has been a 6000% increase in reported vaccine deaths in 1st quarter 2021 as compared to 1st quarter 2020.

What is going on with these experimental shots? 

As previously described, debilitating side affects often follow these injections. Common reactions include headaches, body aches and fatigue. Pain and weakness in the legs is a frequent refrain. People tell of muscle and joint pain, dizziness, chills and nausea, and brain fog that impairs their ability to think. Delirium and confusion often accompanies the brain fog. 

Impairment is often so severe that a person is unable to function for days, weeks, or even longer. People frequently report that they just haven’t “felt right” since their shots. The clouded thinking or body aches just won’t go away.

Redefining vaccine damage as ‘the vaccine is working’

These reactions are so common, pharma cannot deny them. So now injurious effects are being spun by the media as not only “normal”, but positive. Adverse reactions are proof that the vaccine is “working”. 

What is actually taking place? One clue comes from a paper analyzing data from Pfizer’s early vaccine trials. It reveals that in the week following vaccination, lymphocyte counts drop precipitously.

Lymphocytes, or white blood cells, are the body’s defense against unwanted invaders. Without active lymphocytes we cannot mount an immune response to a SARS-CoV-2 virus or any other opportunistic pathogen. As seen in Pfizer’s graph, lymphocytes are nearly wiped out for at least several days following mRNA injection. 

According to the study, “Vaccine RNA can be modified by incorporating 1-methylpseudouridine, which dampens innate immune sensing and increases mRNA translation in vivo. The BNT162b1 vaccine candidate that is currently investigated clinically incorporates such nucleoside-modified mRNA.”  

Dr. Rob Rennebohm, MD, explains, “This means that the vaccine manufacturers have deliberately added a substance (1-methylpseudouridine) that dampens innate immune sensing. Innate immune sensing is the first line of defense against all types of infection.” 

The populations most at risk if they lose immune function are the very groups who were excluded from pharma’s trials, now being urged to get their shots first—the elderly and immune-compromised.

But immune suppression may be a negligible issue when compared to other problems caused by these experimental injections. Serious reactions have included anaphylaxis, Bell’s Palsy, seizures, strokes, transverse myelitis, heart attacks, and as discussed in Part One, miscarriages.

What else may be contributing to these adverse events?

PEG, syncytin-homologous proteins, pathogenic priming  

To start with, the mRNA in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s shots are “pegalated”—encapsulated with nanoparticles of polyethylene glycol (PEG). These PEG nanolipids act as a delivery system for the mRNA.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Vice-President and Chief Scientific Officer at Pfizer Global R&D, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, warn, “70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.”

It is estimated that as many as 7% of Americans have high enough levels of antibodies to PEG that exposure can cause anaphylactic shock. Indeed, anaphylaxis has occurred so frequently following vaccination, the risk from PEG in these shots has been acknowledged by the FDA

While the CDC downplays the risk, they advise that: 

“COVID-19 vaccination locations should have at least 3 doses [emphasis theirs] of epinephrine available at all times, and the ability to quickly obtain additional doses to replace supplies after epinephrine is administered to a patient. People with a history of anaphylaxis who carry an epinephrine autoinjector could be reminded to bring it to their vaccination appointment.” [source

VAERS data currently shows 2,578 reports of anaphylaxis immediately following injection. Anaphylaxis is just the immediate, potentially fatal reaction from this delivery system. Pegalated mRNA can also cause serious long-range consequences, says neuroscientist Dr. Chris Shaw:

“The mRNA lipid-coated PEG-construct—by Moderna’s own study—does not stay localized, but spreads throughout the body, including the brain. Found in animal studies in bone marrow, brain, lymph nodes, heart, kidneys, liver, lungs, etc. Doctors are saying that the vaccine does NOT cross the blood-brain barrier, but that is NOT true. …If it reaches the brain there will be an autoimmune response that will cause inflammation. That is characteristic to virtually all neuro-degenerative diseases—Lou Gehrig’s disease, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s, etc.” [source]

Next, there is a total absence of data regarding reproductive impacts. Before the vaccines were even granted emergency use authorization, experts expressed concern that the spike proteins the mRNA packages are designed to generate could cause miscarriages and infertility. Not a single study, however, was done on pregnant women.

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg explains that the syncytin-homologous protein produced by the mRNA vaccine can cause antibodies against syncytin-1, the protein essential for the formation of placentas:

“There is one gene which is part of our genome that is regulating the placenta growing in the uterus… This protein is very similar to proteins that have been described in the spike cell of the coronavirus… It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.” 

Pfizer and Moderna’s own materials acknowledge that there is zero safety data on pregnant women and on reproductive impacts. Here is how the CDC spins that absence of data:

“There are currently limited data on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant people… If you are pregnant, you may choose to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. There is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems.” 

The CDC implies that because no data exists on reproductive issues for this new biotechnology, we can trust it won’t be a problem. Having “no evidence”—because pharma excluded pregnant women from their trials and didn’t do research on infertility—now conveys safety.

The UK government issued guidance that “pregnant women should not routinely have this vaccine… In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.” [emphasis theirs] However, an expectant mother “should be reassured that the vaccine does not contain live SARS-CoV-2 virus and therefore cannot cause COVID-19 infection in her or in her baby.”  This reassurance is another red herring. It does not address the spike protein issue experts warned about.

Many miscarriages immediately following the shots, as noted in Part One, are already being reported in the US. And data shows a 366% increase in UK miscarriages in the first six weeks of their rollout.

That pregnant women would choose to be part of this experiment, risking the lives of their unborn babies, is testimony to how effective the propaganda has been. 

Will long-term or even permanent infertility also result? That is yet another unknown in this global experiment.

But perhaps the greatest risk of all—an impact yet to come—are phenomena known as Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) and pathogenic priming

All attempts to develop coronavirus vaccines in the past were unsuccessful because of these phenomena. In animal trials, the vaccines provoked development of antibodies as intended, but when the animals were exposed later to the virus—called a challenge—an exaggerated immune response killed the animals. The body develops hypersensitivity to the virus and mounts an out-of-control systemic autoimmune response, attacking its own cells and organs. In a trial for a SARS-CoV-1 vaccine using ferrets, when the animals were challenged later by the wild virus, every ferret died. This challenge, coming into contact with the wild virus, could happen days, months or years after vaccination. 

Scientists, including high-profile vaccinologists, warned about this potentially lethal autoimmune response long before Covid-19 vaccine clinical trials began. In the Warp Speed rush to a #CovidVaccine, pharma claimed that this dilemma which has stopped development of coronavirus vaccines for the last twenty years had now been solved. They offered no proof of that assertion. It was simply announced as fact.

“I was shocked to see that the FDA is rolling this [injection] out with prioritization of people in nursing homes. Absolutely shocked. Because that’s where the highest severe coronavirus disease enhancement and pathogenic priming is going to take place. It’s almost a certainty that we’re going to see mass casualties from this as a result of pathogenic priming.” – Senior Research Scientist Dr. James Lyons-Weiler [source]

Prior to Europe’s vaccine rollout, Dr. Yeadon, along with Dr. Wodarg, filed a petition to halt the Phase III clinical trials of the Pfizer mRNA injection until they were restructured to address these critical safety concerns. 

More and more doctors and scientists, all censored by the mainstream, are voicing these kinds of warnings. One of the most recent is Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche.

Vanden Bossche, a Belgian virologist and vaccine developer who has worked for both GAVI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, adds another concern into the mix. “The key question”, he says in an interview, is “why does nobody seem to bother about viral immune escape?” He makes the case that this global campaign is a ticking time bomb, warning that “mass vaccination with leaky Covid-19 vaccines in the midst of a pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants,” 

What is a “leaky” vaccine?

Efficacy has previously always been measured according to how well a vaccine 1) prevents disease transmission, and 2) prevents infection. These shots do neither. People who get these injections can still get infected and can still transmit the virus to others. That is what is meant by a “leaky” vaccine.

UK Column News, March 19, 2021

Pharma’s minimal safety trials were only designed to demonstrate a lower rate of infection among the vaccinated. As stated by Peter Doshi in the British Medical Journal, as well as NOT preventing infection and NOT stopping transmission, there is also no proof that getting the shot reduces hospitalizations or deaths.

A growing concern is the number of fully vaccinated individuals contracting Covid-19 more than 14 days—and sometimes months—after their second shot. Called “breakthrough cases,” there couldn’t be clearer evidence that this experimental injection is “leaky” and does not prevent infection. 

“I was shocked,” said Florida physical therapist Hannah Rewerts when she contracted the virus more than two months after her shots. “I don’t think the public is aware that it [getting the Covid injections] doesn’t mean you’re not getting the virus, and it doesn’t mean you’re not getting sick.” Among dozens in Central Florida who have contracted Covid-19 after being fully vaccinated are three others in Rewerts’ family. “One of my family members actually went to the hospital,” she said. “I mean, that’s pretty severe enough to be concerned about the vaccine.”

The real level of harm from this new, rushed technology won’t be known for years. Not only don’t we know the true safety profile of these injections, the primary criteria for claiming a vaccine is effective have not been met. And despite attempts to censor bad press about adverse reactions, the flood of personal stories on social media has been impossible to contain. 

That may be why the catchphrases used to manipulate public perception have quietly shifted. Rather than the traditional “safe and effective” assurance, there’s a new spin: 

“The benefits outweigh the risks.” 

Do they? What ARE the benefits? 

In a March 6 interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci, Mexican actor/director/producer Eugenio Derbez asks that very question:  “[if] you still can get infected and you can still spread it… what is the main aim of the vaccines?” Dr. Fauci replies, “The main purpose of the vaccine is to prevent you from getting sick, going to the hospital and maybe dying.” He explains that because it does not stop transmission, that is “why we say… that people who were vaccinated should wear a mask when they’re near people who might be vulnerable to infection.”

Promises that once you get your shot you can take off your mask and get back to normal life without fear of infecting others or of contracting Covid yourself—or that some magic percentage of people vaccinated will create herd immunity—are pure disinformation. Social memes such as “I got the #CovidVaccine to protect myself, my family, and my community!” are nothing more than clever propaganda devised by pharma to get shots in arms. 

Intentionally suppressing “innate immune sensing” is the opposite of protection, weakening rather than enhancing your immune response. Risking pathogenic priming is playing Russian roulette with a loaded gun. If you only have reduced symptoms when you contract the virus but can still spread it to others, you are a potential agent of infection, not protection. And if the vaccines are driving the creation of new, even more deadly variants—as previously seen with polio mass vaccination programs—the consequences could be catastrophic. 

Feel-good memes are a brilliant marketing strategy—they appeal to people’s innate desire to be good citizens and help others. But they do not reflect the actual science. You not only can still be infected following vaccination and spread Covid-19 to your family and your community—if Vanden Bossche is correct you could become a superspreader of ever-more virulent strains.

The one thing this injection might do—reduce severity of symptoms if you contract the virus—can be achieved far more safely by taking supplements like vitamin C, zinc, vitamin D3, and quercetin. Hundreds of studies demonstrating remarkable success with inexpensive and benign treatments have also been systematically suppressed.

Never before has a “vaccine” been sold to the public with so great a risk… so little benefit… and so much pressure.

The fearful are motivated with carrots and intimidated with sticks — we will only be able to open up society after 80% or more are “fully vaccinated”. And then, it’s only those with a vaccine passport who will be able to freely engage in travel, school, concerts and sporting events, hospitality services, traditional retail activities, and work.

Family members who are taken in by the mainstream narrative are issuing ultimatums: get the shot or you can never visit me, your grandkids, your mother/father, or fill-in-the-blank, again. People steeped in the relentless messaging then parrot that propaganda… like the cartoonist in this week’s Port Townsend Leader who is “so ready” to get her shots and concludes, “The real work starts when we have to convince our loved ones to get the vaccine. If we don’t we’ll never hit herd immunity.”

That is fiction from the myth makers. The greater a portion of the public harboring a leaky vaccine, the LESS possible it will be to achieve herd immunity. The only ones in society who will be contributing to herd immunity are people who had the virus and developed natural immunity. Carriers of a leaky vaccine will be unprotected from infection, just experience lesser symptoms, and will still be able to transmit the virus. Worst case, they will also be driving the development of more virulent strains. The more people who get the shot, the LOWER our herd immunity.

But we are being told the inverse. It is the healthy people refusing to submit to this dangerous experiment who are being portrayed as Typhoid Marys, putting lives at risk by simply breathing. The irony is that it’s the vaccinated who are likely to be carrying infections without showing symptoms, spreading the virus, and, according to Vanden Bossche, driving a “tsunami of morbidity and lethality that is now threatening us.” 

Sara Beltrán Ponce, the doctor who tragically miscarried days after her second shot (see Part One) enthusiastically trusted that the #CovidVaccine would protect her and her unborn baby. Hashtag slogans and internet memes are part of a comprehensive campaign of social engineering, broadcast by media and the medical-government-pharma complex day in and day out to indoctrinate us. 

Had Dr. Ponce looked outside that spin machine—Pfizer’s and Moderna’s own materials acknowledge that there is not a shred of data to establish safety in pregnancy—she would have likely reached the same conclusion as her peers who are refusing the shot. 

Global pushback 

Over one million citizens from Germany and surrounds rally for health freedom in Berlin, August 1, 2020

As damage mounts, so do calls for an immediate halt to this global experiment.

Demonstrations all over the world are protesting government overreach and top-down medical tyranny, which is demanding compliance with disastrous lockdowns and coercing citizens to accept experimental injections. In the US, those citizens challenging the narrative are being demonized as “Covid deniers”, anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorists, selfish granny killers, and even “domestic terrorists”. 

As many world governments grow increasingly authoritarian, they use the fear of Covid to eliminate freedoms and criminalize dissent. Citizen pushback is typically ignored, downplayed or vilified by the mainstream press.

The Berlin rally for health freedom pictured above is a classic example. Independent reporting describes a peaceful gathering of “concerned citizens, mothers, fathers, grandmothers, grandfathers, doctors, lawyers, business owners… the official numbers from the police were 800,000 to 1.3 million, with 2-3 million people in the general vicinity.” Mainstream media reported “roughly 17,000 protestors”—”anti-vaccine groups and some far-right and neo-Nazi organizations” dispersed by police.

These mischaracterizations are no surprise. What IS shocking is the censorship and/or discrediting of highly credentialed, distinguished scientists and medical professionals, in a wholesale dismissal of valid scientific inquiry and the refusal to allow respectful open debate. 

In December 2020, the petition filed by Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg to stop Covid vaccine trials addressed four concerns: 1) ADE/pathogenic priming; 2) fertility issues from syncytin-homologous proteins; 3) PEG causing allergic, potentially fatal anaphylactic reactions; and 4) lack of long-term data.

In February 2021, an Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns went even further. Doctors for Covid Ethics published a call for adherence to international codes prohibiting human medical experimentation. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is lead signatory of an international group of 12 prominent experts and 80 endorsers with specialties ranging from immunology and virology to genetics to medical ethics.

The letter questions “whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval” by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). It expresses concerns about what is occurring in care homes, and notes a “wide range of side effects” reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals

They conclude that “the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute ‘human experimentation’, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.” They implore EU regulators to halt Covid vaccinations unless significant safety issues are addressed.  

In the U.S., physician-scientist Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, has joined the growing list of alarmed professionals, calling out a “clear and present danger.” In a letter to FDA officials, pharma executives and media he says, “it is untenable for you and your colleagues to be ignoring these deaths and vaccine complications without lifting a finger to do anything — simply this: These complications are mounting and CDC and FDA’s surveillance systems are missing the signal.”  

The “signal” Noorchashm is speaking of is the death of vaccine recipients—some of them high-profile celebrities—who were vaccinated despite being already infected with Covid-19: “Benjamin Goodman, J. Barton Williams, Kassidi Lyn Kurill, Marvin Hagler, Hank Aaron, Larry King… these are Americans being harmed and ignored … by you and our public health system.” 

Is the body’s manufacturing of spike proteins, engineered by the shot, triggering autoimmune attacks? Is this the pathogenic priming phenomenon that killed animals in earlier coronavirus vaccine trials? Many doctors and scientists censored by the mainstream press think so. 

“If you are already immune, if you’ve already been infected, your risk goes way up of adverse events and death,” says Dr. Paul Thomas on his weekly podcast Against the Wind: Doctors and Science Under Fire. “It’s the most reckless thing I’ve ever seen in medical history.” 

International pioneer in women’s health Dr. Christiane Northrup agrees: “All it does is make people THINK they’re safe… Don’t let yourself get trampled by the lemmings headed for the cliff.”

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche has also published an urgent appeal— Open Letter to the WHO: Immediately Halt All Covid-19 Mass VaccinationsHis March 6th letter asserts that, “We are currently turning vaccine recipients into asymptomatic carriers who are shedding infectious variants….[W]e’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectious virus that completely resists our most precious defense mechanism: the human immune system.”

Calling this experiment a “colossal blunder,” vaccinologist Vanden Bossche does not mince words: “Immediate cancelation of all ongoing mass Covid-19 vaccination campaigns should now become THE most acute health emergency of international concern.”

These dire warnings are from eminent scientists and doctors so concerned about the gravity of this experiment that they are willing to risk reputations and careers. They know they will be censored and targeted for challenging the narrative. And while their voices rarely make it past the gatekeepers controlling that narrative, half of Americans can still sense that something isn’t right here.

The federal government has now earmarked $1.5 BILLION for an ad campaign to convince “vaccine skeptics” to get their shots. In a major PR blitz, our tax dollars “will use TV, radio, and digital means to target young Americans, people of color, and Republicans who may be more likely to be hesitant or ambivalent about getting vaccinated.”

If those who are speaking out against all odds are correct, the fate of humankind rests not on our compliance, but on our refusal to participate. The most caring choice to protect ourselves, family, friends and community is to just say no. 

There is a vast gulf between two camps: those who believe that lockdowns “save lives,” and those aware that these measures have had little if any impact on the spread of Covid and have caused far more death and destruction than the virus… those who believe the shots are our path to freedom, and those who agree with the doctors and scientists saying that this global medical experiment has to stop now.  

The former trust mainstream propaganda; the latter do not. The former think that the powerful interests behind the narrative have our well-being at heart, are leading us with science, are telling us the truth. The latter, like CNA James Develon  see the mounting wreckage and understand that we are being lied to. 

The injection question just may pose the most critical choice of our lifetime.

 

Ana Wolpin

Arriving in Port Townsend in 1975 in Sherpa, her Ford van, Ana Wolpin has watched a sweetly funky, diverse and tolerant community increasingly gentrify, polarize and lose its soul. After almost half a century engaged in local business, city politics, county organizations and community projects, she joined with fellow editors to revive the Free Press and bear witness to extraordinary times. For a short sketch of Ana's history in Jefferson County, see “About the Free Press."

Comment Guidelines

We welcome contrary viewpoints. Diversity of opinion is sorely lacking in Port Townsend, in part because dissenting views are often suppressed, self-censored and made very unwelcome. Insults, taunts, bullying, all-caps shouting, intimidation, excessive or off-topic posting, and profanity do not qualify as serious discourse, as they deter, dilute, and drown it out. Comments of that nature will be removed and offenders will be blocked. Allegations of unethical, immoral, or criminal behavior need to be accompanied by supporting evidence, links, etc. Please limit comments to 500 words.

17 Comments

  1. John Opalko

    Ana, Thank you for taking the time to research and write this article. Well done.

    Reply
  2. Ben Montalbano

    As I read both Part One and Part Two of Ana’s posting, I became struck with the recurring question, “Is the problem a virus or the government and corporate response to the emergence of this virus?” We can all see that nationally and locally we are being given only one remedy, vaccination with an experimental genetically engineered agent. We know the vaccine won’t protect us from contracting the virus and spreading it, but we are told it will lessen our symptoms. The question is, aren’t there other natural and proven safe chemical remedies that would do the same? Authorities, without peer reviewed studies, have said no and in fact from the very beginning our only solution to this “deadly” virus and “going back to normal” will be a vaccine. Why only this one choice? If there were remedies that would help with symptoms, as the experimental vaccine might do, the CDC would never had approved something experimental. This leaves us with the fact that the experimental vaccine was meant from the beginning as the only solution. The vaccine was developed two weeks after the emergence of the virus and no serious alternatives were ever considered by government health officials or their pharmaceutical supporters.

    A mother to her 6 year old who won’t eat vegetables. “Do you want carrots or peas with dinner?”

    This is the illusion of choice. An authority, like Mom, your government or your doctor gives you a structured intended choice between two planned remedies to a current crisis. What then, like the vegetable biased child, do you pick? This is also called a double bind. Like the vegetable phobic child, you are damned if you do and damned if you don’t. In any scenario, the authority figure gets what they want and you are doomed to follow one or the other. The cost of such a bind leaves one at the least confused and at the worse schizophrenic.

    This, from the beginning, has been our national and world wide illusion of choice. Either get the experimental vaccine or possibly die. The mass media keeps us frightened of an impending death from Covid and big tech also censors all voices giving us other choices. The only way out of this or any double bind or illusion of choice is to STOP PLAYING THE GAME. We have other choices and the easiest is to keep our magnificent immune system, that Mother Nature has endowed us with, as robust and healthy as possible and if you do catch this flu there are remedies out there that don’t involve anything experimental. Remember after all is said and done we have a 99% chance of surviving this virus as millions that have had the virus can attest to.

    Reply
  3. Ana Wolpin

    Thank you, John and Ben.

    New information:
    In WA state there are over 100 people now documented who were fully vaccinated, and at least two weeks post-second dose were diagnosed with Covid-19. Eight of them were hospitalized and two died. That is just in our state. The leaky vaccine is already causing deaths that fit the pathogenic priming experience. Having developed antibodies to the virus, when re-exposed to Covid, these people had a response severe enough to be hospitalized or killed.

    At the end of March, CDC Director Rochelle P. Walensky warned of “impending doom” because despite significant vaccination uptake, cases are spiking again. Hospitalizations in the US had seen an increase in one week from 4600 admissions per day up to 4800 admissions per day. Deaths were also rising. Dr. Walensky’s fear messaging, in line with the narrative, was that the answer is more people need to be vaccinated.

    Exactly what the scientists in this article have warned about is manifesting. If this injection works as promised, why are hospitalizations and deaths increasing as the number of Americans being vaccinated rises? The opposite should be true. How will getting shots in more arms fix the issues with leaky vaccines, pathogenic priming and the potential for vaccinations to “breed highly infectious variants”?

    Reply
    • Les Walden

      Anna, the last paragraph brings out a very good point. If these shots are so great, why are the numbers of infection rising? I’m sure it will be blamed on the people who refuse the shots. Time will tell.

      Reply
  4. Hannah McFarland

    The numerous flaws in the justifications of the covid “vaccine” are mind boggling. Ana’s article (part 1 & 2) provides much needed information about this. Such as “research” subjects being selected from more healthy groups of people. Thus, this assists in getting their preferred “results.” I have heard Dr. Tom Locke (JeffCo Public Health Officer) say that medicine suffers from a lack of trust from the public. There is abundant information in Ana’s article that explains the source of public mis-trust regarding vaccines, recommendations from public health authorities, etc. And he claims those who question the conventional narrative are mis-informed. Supreme gratitudes to the Truth Seekers.

    Reply
  5. Beth M ONeal

    I appreciate this article so much. We need to hear more about the concerns regarding this massive immunization push. Thank you so much for your work.

    Reply
  6. Stephen Schumacher

    Wow, Ana… excellent wide-ranging examination of the vaccine situation!! Some hot takes: (1) It was incredibly disingenuous not to include the elderly and pregnant from clinical trials or to do controlled studies, allegedly for humanitarian reasons, but then to subject and promote these risks uncontrolled on the wider population of elderly and pregnant; (2) CDC spins “currently no evidence [that] COVID-19 vaccines cause fertility problems” as if lack of testing is a plus, ignoring reports of miscarriages and placenta-inhibiting antibodies; (3) UK “advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months” after the vaccine, thereby reducing fertility by public policy promotion of the vaccine, saying moms “should be reassured that the vaccine does not contain live SARS-CoV-2 virus”, which is about as low a bar as the Apr. 3 SNL spoof saying the vaccine doesn’t contain syphillis; (4) Given that the experimental shots prevent neither disease transmission nor infection, just reduce some symptoms, why is this symptomatic treatment promoted as a “vaccine”? The answer seems to be the propaganda value and immunity from civil liability for injuries that vaccines unjustly enjoy.

    Reply
    • Stephen Schumacher

      Today in the news, “FDA temporarily halts use of Johnson & Johnson vaccine due to rare blood clotting issues”. But have no fear: according to “simply wrong and untrue” NYTimes misreporting, “As of Monday, 6.8 million people in the United States had received the vaccine without any other serious adverse reactions reported”.
      https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1382030127324917765

      Reply
    • Jim Scarantino

      Only anecdotal but these are two people I know personally. Men, both aged 65-70, otherwise vigorous, strong. Both were laid out flat by vaccine injections here in PT. Took 24-48 hours to recover and get back on their feet.

      Reply
  7. Ana Wolpin

    In the week since my last comment:

    The CDC has now reported 5800 Covid infections in fully vaccinated people—396 required hospitalization, and 74 died from Covid more than two weeks after getting their shots. These “breakthrough cases” continue to reinforce that this leaky vaccine cannot stop transmission or infection, and there is no evidence that they are reducing hospitalizations or deaths. It is also becoming clear that the shots do not protect against variants.
    https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/14/health/breakthrough-infections-covid-vaccines-cdc/index.html

    As other commenters have noted, despite ongoing efforts to downplay the numbers and severity of reactions, the AstraZeneca and Johnson&Johnson adenovirus vector shots are causing so many blood clots, they have been halted through most of Europe, and the J&J is now on “pause” in the US. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) blood clots are occurring in the brain, in combination with low levels pf blood platelets (thrombocytopenia). Most recently a healthy 43-year-old Mississippi man suffered a stroke just hours after his J&J shot, and now cannot walk or talk. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-19-vaccine-news/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=c2658670-8814-4b16-bf20-22cc0f01ddac

    As warned by Drs. Yeadon, Wodarg and others, fertility issues are also manifesting. In addition to pregnant women miscarrying, menstruating women are also experiencing issues following the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots. Pharma never monitored this concern, and now it’s up to women on social media to conduct the real trials. They are noting heavier, longer and more painful periods as well as “messed up” menstrual cycles. When University of Illinois professor Dr. Kate Clancy put out a tweet asking if other women were noticing these changes post-vax, the flood of responses caused her and a colleague to create an online survey. Over 13,000 women have already responded. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9446907/Some-women-report-heavier-painful-PERIODS-getting-COVID-19-vaccine.html

    There have been more than twice as many Covid vaccine deaths reported to VAERS in the few months since these experimental injections were rolled out (2342 in 3-1/2 months) as in the last DECADE for all other vaccines combined (994 over 10 years). That translates to nearly 100 times as many Covid vaccine deaths per month as for all prior vaccines.
    https://archive.is/mqXNN

    Despite injury and deaths continuing to rise, fully vaccinated people contracting the virus, predictions of fertility issues being confirmed, and no protection against variants, pressure to get your shots just keeps escalating, The White House has now upped funding for their PR marketing blitz targeting the “vaccine hesitant” from $1.5 billion to $4 billion. Because the experimental vaccine is so ineffective, Pfizer CEO announced a third shot will be needed, plus annual injections. When a dangerous product does not work, pharma’s answer is that you need more of it. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/15/pfizer-ceo-says-third-covid-vaccine-dose-likely-needed-within-12-months.html

    Reply
    • Annette Huenke

      One has to wonder why J&J and AstraZeneca are the center of attention on the clotting issue:
      “VAERS data released today showed 795 reports related to blood clotting disorders with 400 attributed to Pfizer, 337 to Moderna and 56 to Johnson & Johnson between Dec.14, 2020 and April 8, 2021.” [tinyurl.com/d7m8efs7]
      It’s worth asking if there are powerful interests promoting the mRNA tech over the adenovirus vaccines for various reasons, including Fauci’s and NIAID’s patents and investment (of US taxpayer dollars) in the Moderna product.

      Reply
  8. Ana Wolpin

    Only days later, another update on fertility impacts which grow more and more troubling. Not only are thousands of women reporting painful, heavy menstruation, out of sync with their regular cycles after taking the jab (along with miscarriages), but now reports are coming in from women with severe bleeding and cramps who are POST-menopausal. Even women who didn’t get the shots, but are around people who did, are having similar issues. A few examples:

    “GP ended up sending me [10-years-post-menopausal woman who started bleeding following shot] to A&E and then onto ward gynaecologist/surgeon told me lots of woman coming forward with vaginal bleeding/hemorrhaging. She even asked why I would have a vaccine I don’t need.”

    “This is insane!! My mother is over the age of 60 and works in LTC, she didn’t get the shots but all her co-workers did. She called me and told me she had the worst cramps ever and dark blood. She’s well past menopause… wtf!!”

    “omg, my aunt is 78 years old and hasn’t taken the jab, she started getting her period recently. She lives in an elderly community and most of the people have taken the jab.”

    “I’m 41 and have never had an irregular period in my entire life. I’m a physician and am around people that have been vaccinated (although I would NEVER be vaccinated myself). I’ve had spotting for weeks post menses and my period is over a week late. First time in my life. And extreme PMS.”

    Many more accounts here: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/women-complaining-of-severe-menstrual-disorders-post-covid-injections-even-if-they-did-not-get-the-shots/

    What has been unleashed on a credulous public being fed a steady diet of disinformation? How many anecdotal examples of obvious fertility impacts need to be circulated on social media before the gatekeepers of this narrative acknowledge that a Pandora’s box has been opened with experimental biotech never proven safe?

    Reply
  9. Annette Huenke

    This just in — scientists in Israel, where some 50% of the population have taken the Pfizer jab, are looking into the possibility that it may contribute to re-emergence of herpes zoster, also known as shingles:

    “The safety profile of mRNA-based vaccines in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) is unknown. The objective of this report is to raise awareness to reactivation of herpes zoster (HZ) following the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination in patients with AIIRD.

    This is what vaccine safety trials look like. Here is where we learn about the body’s reaction to injection with these experimental products. Will we be looking back on these warning signs and wishing we’d done more research before rolling up the sleeve?

    https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/rheumatology/keab345/6225015?searchresult=1

    Reply
    • Ana Wolpin

      “This is what vaccine safety trials look like.” As the UK Column discussed on 4/19 (https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-19th-april-2021), an ethical trial requires fully informed consent and a nurse assigned to each participant—monitoring and following up on their experience over time, and scrupulously reporting all unusual responses and adverse events. No such system is in place anywhere in the world, and in the US we literally have drive-thru jabs where if someone hasn’t fainted in the moments immediately following their shot, they’re good to go.

      Despite billions of our tax dollars being spent in the US to recruit celebrities and “thought leaders” to convince the public that these shots are safe, surveys assessing “vaccine hesitancy” reveal that the largest percentage of people saying no are medical personnel and healthcare workers.

      WHY DO FIRST RESPONDERS HAVE THE HIGHEST REFUSAL RATES FOR THESE SHOTS? Because they are seeing first-hand the fallout post-injection that the mainstream is covering up and denying. Nurses in hospitals asking to remain anonymous for fear of losing their jobs are writing the UK Column to describe the glut of adverse reactions they are witnessing daily which are not being reported (see link above). Both the German Corona Investigative Committee and Children’s Health Defense in the US are being contacted by insiders from nursing homes all over the world describing deaths and devastation similar to what was described in Part One. For anyone who wants to hear what is really going on, the heavily-censored story and consequences are discussed here https://www.bitchute.com/video/pyP0h9k1Snyp/ and here https://www.bitchute.com/video/eOUZCZ8kKLNS/.

      Reply
  10. Annette Huenke

    What can possibly go wrong when you roll up in your car and get your jab as though you’re getting a burger from McDonalds? Here’s one example: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4NMG77MruSWc/
    How many people is this happening to AFTER they leave the parking lot? Are those auto accident deaths and injuries recorded with VAERS? Of course not.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.