Pressure Mounts for Action on Hadlock Sewer

Pressure Mounts for Action on Hadlock Sewer

77% of Landowners Petition Jefferson County Commission

Landowners representing 77% of the areas of Port Hadlock zoned for commercial, industrial and multi-family units on June 18, 2018, delivered to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners their petition for action on the long-delayed sewer project.
Their petition requests that the BOCC “investigate the cost and feasibility of building a sewer in the Port Hadlock UGA” to serve the areas zoned for those uses.  More significantly, the petition states the landowners’ interest in forming a Local Improvement District to permit financing of the sewer.  An LID would spread the cost of the sewer among the covered landowners over a set number of years.
The signatories represent 200.91 acres of the 260.75 acres in those areas.  Only 1 landowner submitted a dissenting statement.  He owns only about a third of an acre.
According to one of the signatories, who requested that their name not be printed, representatives of the landowners group have held two meetings with county staff with one commissioner present.  As a result of those meetings, the county has contracted for a cost study of the Hadlock system using the grinder pump collection and membrane bio-reactor treatment contained in a plan for a wastewater system in Quilcene.  This technology could possibly cut the cost of the Hadlock sewer in half.  Using technology that is decades old, the cost of the Hadlock sewer is estimated at about $45 million.
Land for a sewer plant has been acquired and the county says the project is “shovel ready.”  $13.4 million of the necessary funding has been secured.
Since 2008, the Jefferson County Port Hadlock UGA Sewer Facility Plan has recommended establishment of an LID.
Attached to the petitions were letters from the Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding and the Old Alcohol Plant.  They did not sign the petition but submitted supporting statements.
David Blessing, President of the Board of Directors, wrote, “The Boat School recognizes there is a problem with septic capacity for commercial and multiple home sites which prevents expansion and economic growth in Port Hadlock…. We strongly believe it is in the county’s best interests to build such a sewer system.”
Blessing pointed to a problem confronting many Hadlock businesses.  They must maintain, upgrade and/or expand existing septic systems to continue operations, while they call for construction of the sewer.  The Valley Tavern, for instance, recently did substantial work on its septic system at considerable cost.  Nonetheless, it’s owner signed onto the petition  The Boat School is moving forward with expansion of its existing system, precluding it from immediately joining an LID, though it may be interested “down the road.”
Gary Kiester, managing partner of the Old Alcohol Plant, wrote that his organization recognizes “the immediate need to investigate the feasibility” of a sewer to serve commercial, industrial and multi-family zoned properties.  “Delays in moving forward on this crucial project will only increase costs…. The project will not only improve…land value[s] but will generate additional and needed revenue to the county through permitting, job creation and moderately priced homes…. We see no downside in moving this forward convincingly.”
Kiester added that his company wants to build an additional five-story hotel that could increase the capability of its major tenant, Bayside Housing, which houses and transitions the homeless into permanent housing.  The new construction would also “provide additional rooms for low income seniors.”  Due to the limitations on their septic drain field, however, the construction cannot proceed.
Kiester closed by stating that once costs are determined “we would happily sign on to a form a Local Improvement District….”
With the addition of the 11 acres owned between the Boat School and the Old Alcohol Plant the percentage of land owners in the affected area calling for the new cost study and endorsing an LID exceeds 81%.
In our next report, we will examine another sewage treatment technology that could greatly reduce the cost and construction time of the Hadlock system.
See our related report:  Glimmers of Hope for the Hadlock Sewer, which examines brightening prospects for federal infrastructure funding.
Here is the full Quilcene Wastewater Facility Study, prepared by Tetra Tech of Seattle for the Port of Port Townsend, which spearheaded the investigation.

A SPECIAL INDEPENDENCE DAY FOR PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS

Port Townsend and Jeffco Contracts Requiring
Payment of Union Dues Now Unenforceable
 

Pop quiz: If you belong to a collective bargaining unit in Jefferson County, and if that collective bargaining unit took money from you to support the reelection of President Trump, would you be:
A – Happy
B – Unhappy
C – Indifferent
Given the results of the 2016 presidential election, my hunch is that most people would choose Response B because a lot of people in Jefferson County do not support the President. Ergo, they probably do not want their hard-earned money used to support someone with whom they disagree.
To those of you who chose Response B be assured, for whatever it’s worth, that I have your six on this issue. The very idea of taking away somebody’s money and using it to promote something they don’t like is a cringeworthy violation of the First Amendment. It’s not free speech; it’s rather expensive speech and it’s financed by forcing people to pay-up regardless of their beliefs.
That’s why last week’s Supreme Court decision in the Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees case is so important. This particular case ruled that a 41-year-old Illinois law which forced employees who do not belong to a union, but are represented by a collective bargaining unit, to give their money to that union.
While this decision does not affect union members at the Port Townsend mill or other private employer unions, it does affect anybody who belongs to a union representing government employees, school teachers, fire and police personnel and so forth.
This decision frees non-union members from being compelled to give their money to a collective bargaining unit in support of something they oppose. This is good news for opponents of President Trump who would not want their paychecks shrunk by force so the money could be used to support the Administration. It is also good news for the workers who like what the President is doing and don’t want a portion of their wages used to undermine policies with which they agree.
It turns out that Supreme Court Associate Justice Elena Kagan disagrees with me. She would apparently be happy with unions in Jefferson County and elsewhere supporting Trump with money taken from people who oppose him. Kagan, in her dissent, goes so far as to argue that this decision amounts to, “weaponizing the First Amendment.”
Maybe it’s just me but does anyone else find it peculiar that Kagan would make such a statement given her political leanings? After all, Slate Magazine described Kagan as, “the most influential liberal justice,” on the court. So why is she articulating a position that is in such stark contrast with the greatest liberal Democrat icon of the 20th century, Franklin Delano Roosevelt?
The public sector unions that want to take money from non-union members were vociferously opposed by President Franklin Roosevelt. He never even bothered to get around to whether such unions should be able to take money from non-members. He said flat-out that public sector unions are wrong.
When asked by a reporter in 1937 whether he supported unions for government employees, Roosevelt was unequivocal in his response saying, “Not in the government, because there is no collective contract. It is a very different case. There isn’t any bargaining, in other words, with the government, therefore the question does not arise.”
Perhaps the time has come for Jefferson County Democrats, liberals, progressives and others cut from similar cloth to revisit Roosevelt’s values and take a stand by advocating the elimination public sector unions altogether. That’s what FDR would want. Given that the issue of campaign finance was raised at the June 24 Honesty Forum in Port Ludlow, it’s a fair question for the candidates running for office.
Scott Hogenson lives in Jefferson County. He is a former Teamster and a former member of the Amalgamated Meat Cutters Union.
Editor’s Note
The Janus decision will have a substantial impact on the area’s public sector employees. We took a look at a few of their union contracts.
The city’s contract requires that all its employees join and pay dues to General Teamster’s Local Union 589.  The contract recognizes only religious First Amendment rights in protecting an employee being forced to join.  The Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment’s free speech and freedom of association clauses mandate that anyone having an objection to joining a public-sector union may not be compelled to do so.
The City’s union contract oddly required employees with a religious objection to union membership to give the equivalent of their dues to a non-religious or other charity selected—get this–not by the employee, but by the Teamsters and the City.  If they could not agree, the Washington Department of Licensing and Industry would determine the charity to be paid each month by that employee. That clause is certainly illegal now.
Jefferson County has the same clause in its contracts with Teamster Local 589.  The Port Townsend School District also has a similar clause in its contract with the Port Townsend Education Association.  That clause required the union to participate in the selection of the charity to be paid.  The school district’s contract with the Service Employees International Union and its Local 925 incorporates a similar clause but allows the employee objecting to forced union membership on religious grounds to steer her dues equivalent to a charity of her choice.
Here is the pertinent clause from the City’s Teamster’s contract:

Here is the equivalent clause from the School District’s agreement with the PTEA:

 

A BLOODY AFTERNOON IN KAH TAI PARK

A BLOODY AFTERNOON IN KAH TAI PARK

A 911 call:  assault in progress, Kah Tai Park.  On their way police listen to an open line, a second call originating from inside the park.  A man screams for help.  Then another voice comes on and shouts, “Give me that phone!” The line goes dead.

A jogger who made the 911 call meets the officers at a park entrance.  The attack was underway when he ran past.  It was underway while he called and waited.  He points.  They can see the attack still underway.  A shirtless man  kicks a person on the ground.  Another man, a large man, throws punches.

Officers stop the attack.  The victim is 60 years old.   Blood covers his face and head.  He is choking on it.  An eye is swollen shut.  Blood soaks the ground around him.

This is the heart of Port Townsend, Washington.  Wednesday, June 6, 2018.  Just before 3 in the afternoon.

The assailants turn their fury on police.  Handcuffed, they can hurl only profanity and threats.  Heavily intoxicated and hard to understand, they complain about being arrested.  In between threatening and resisting the officers, they justify their violence.  They were serving “street justice” on a “rapist, pedophile.”

They also helped themselves to the man’s backpack and cell phone.

The “alleged” assailants, William Anthony Ingalsbe, 30, and John Rayford Fleming, 33, were arrested on charges of robbery 1st degree, assault 2nd degree, intimidating a public servant and obstructing a law enforcement officer.

Ingalsbe and Fleming are half the victim’s age.  Ingalsbe is taller and outweighs the victim by seventy pounds.

The attackers wear his blood on their shirts, pants, shoes.

KNOWN TRANSIENTS”

News reports have described Fleming and Ingalsbe as “known transients.”  Their story is not much different from the other “known transients” on Port Townsend’s streets who occupy much of our police department’s time and make life difficult for businesses, their employees and customers.  We started looking into this story before another act of extreme violence on our streets occurred.  That incident, on July 1 in downtown Port Townsend, left one suffering terrible stab wounds and another “known transient” in jail on attempted murder charges.  (A booking error listed the charge as murder and we had initially reflected that error in this story).

 

Sign for open air drug market in Kah Tai Park

 

In a previous report, we wrote about a young man presumed to be dead in Kah Tai Park.  Click “Lights in the Darkness” to read that story.

The following account of the brief time Ingalsbe and Fleming have been in Port Townsend comes from police reports and court records. Every incident and charge of wrongdoing is technically “alleged,” though documented in public records.

Ingalsbe had 34 contacts with police in less than a year before he “died” and returned to life in a burst of violence. Fleming has had 17 contacts with police since he arrived in Port Townsend three months ago.

 

John Rayford Fleming

Fleming first appears in Port Townsend police records in March of this year. He had been harassing staff and threw a wooden pallet down the stairs at a Water Street business. He apparently arrived here from Montesano, WA, where there were reported to be outstanding warrants. Fleming was issued a “no trespass” warning to stay away from that business for one year. Violation would result in a citation. Fleming expressed his attitude by refusing to sign the “no trespass” notice.

The next night he was found illegally sleeping in Kah Tai Park. Police were now able to confirm that Fleming had multiple warrants from out-of-county and out-of-state. Those jurisdictions, however were content to let Port Townsend have him. He ignored a warning against sleeping in the park. He was back the next night and told if it happened again he would be cited for trespass.

Five days later police found him and another man drinking in the park. Fleming verbally abused police and was banned from the Kah Tai for 90 days. That night he was found sleeping in his own vomit outside a Sims Way business.

A few days after that he went to sleep inside a business on Sims Way and became belligerent when awakened. He was “issued a trespass” and banned from that business.

Police saw him shortly after that, passed out on the sidewalk.

Washington has no public intoxication law, a failing that prevents first responders from helping habitual drinkers unless they are so poisoned with alcohol they are in imminent danger of dying.

On April 13, 2018, Fleming was arrested for burglary. By now he was known well enough that police could identify him from a verbal description. A bouncer of a downtown bar said Fleming had been harassing female customers. After a search of the area he was found to have broken into another business. He lashed out at police, verbally and physically. He grabbed the officers, kicked, and threatened them. He attempted to bite an officer. He was found to have in his possession items taken from local businesses, including, oddly enough, a fire extinguisher. He was given a suspended sentence and assessed a fine he could not pay.

Within days, Fleming was again on Port Townsend’s streets.

On April 21, he was arrested for shoplifting from Henery’s Hardware. He was walking down the street in Carhartt overalls security cameras had caught him stealing. He was again given a suspended sentence.

The City Prosecutor’s records show he was sentenced to forty days in jail. But three weeks later police found him passed out on the beach near the mill as the tide was rising.

Two weeks after that he wore the blood of a man he had attacked in Kah Tai Park.

William Anthony Ingalsbe

William Anthony Ingalsbe first made contact with Port Townsend police on August 7, 2015 after arriving here from Colorado, where he had a troubled history. He and a girlfriend were living in a van without plates. From then on, his contacts with police grew more serious.

Ten days later it was a domestic violence call. A month after that an officer checking public trails had to pull his taser against an aggressive dog Ingalsbe claimed to own. A few months on, Ingalsbe was outside the Pennysaver on Sims, slumped between two boxes, management reporting him for harassing customers. He’s “trespassed” and told to stay off the property.

The same day he’s reported at another property, with a guitar over his shoulder, panhandling. He’s also “trespassed” at that business because his behavior had been “an ongoing issue.” A day later, he’s reported trespassing and drunk at a residence.

It is now February 2016. He has been banned from more businesses because of his behavior. He is found sleeping, bloody and covered in vomit and taken to the hospital. He refuses to leave after being discharged and is disrupting the emergency room. He tells police, “arrest me.” They grant his wish, but he’s not in jail long.

Two days later he refuses multiple requests to leave the Food Co-op. Police issue a trespassing admonishment. Not long after, he trespasses at a store from which he’d been banned and receives a warning about an arrest next time it happens. Later in the day he’s warned about having an open container and drinking in public.

Then follow confrontations with employees and customers of businesses along Sims Way and Water Street, public drinking, and a citation for trespassing at a business from which he had been banned. Ingalsbe crumples up the citation.

March 24, 2016, a report comes in of Ingalsbe punching a man in the face, but the victim could not be found. An hour later he is found drunk and cited for trespassing at a business on Sims Way.

The next night he is found illegally sleeping in the park. The officer let him sleep rather than “wake him and have to deal with him all night long because he would be mad at us.”

Two days later he is cited for an open container and consumption of alcohol in the park. He was with two other transients from out of state. From time to time, he has met and consumed alcohol with other transients.

Having ignored the trespass citation, Ingalsbe was arrested on a warrant a couple weeks later while trespassing at yet another business from which he had been barred. His blood alcohol level is .205. But he is again quickly on the streets and cited for trespassing at the same business. He promised to appear in court and was released from police custody. He was seen later laying on a patch of gravel on Water Street. A couple days after that he was found sleeping on the sidewalk outside a building, drunk. The police provided him with water because he said he had had none in several days. Later, he was found in his vomit on the sidewalk at the door to a Water Street business. He refused to clean up his mess and was instructed to move along.

Ingalsbe did not honor his court summons and a warrant is used May 16, 2016.

A month passes with no contact. Then a call is received from his girlfriend. He had been at her place looking for his belongings but left on foot.

And then Ingalsbe died.

Or so police were told by a relative. He dropped out of sight and was not seen in Port Townsend for a year until the assault in Kah Tai Park was interrupted.

In the intervening year, as his probation officer learned, Ingalsbe traveled the country and racked up arrests in Nashville and Lebanon, Tennessee; Lawrence, Kansas; Pennington, South Dakota; and Arvada, Colorado. The arrests were for disorderly conduct, except the Arvada incident which involved an assault charge.

Ingalsbe has admitted that he initiated the Kah Tai attack on a man who was a stranger to him. He admitted kneeing the man in the head several times. When asked if he realized the extent of the injuries he and Fleming inflicted, Ingalsbe said, “he’s a 60 year old [expletive] man I beat up for no [expletive] reason.”

He told police he had returned to Port Townsend to party and then to turn himself in and go to jail to sober up.

He is probably getting more time to sober up than he expected. Therein lies the other tragedy in this story that is all too similar to that of other “known transients.” It took a crime of violence to get two habitual drinkers off the street and away from easy access to alcohol.

Unfortunately, the high price for their ticket to sobriety–for however long it may last–was paid with someone else’s blood.

The Victim

The man they attacked was airlifted for emergency medical treatment. He is Lawrence Merrell Alan. He gave police an address we traced to a rental mailbox. The cell phone number he gave police is no longer in service.

 

Alan has been known to police since at least 2012 when he was arrested for assaulting a bus driver. A year later he entered a conditional guilty plea to driving under the influence, while reserving the right to challenge the legality of his arrest. The charge was dismissed after a judge ruled the traffic stop had lacked probable cause.

In 2017 he was arrested for possession of methamphetamine and/or hydrocodone. The charges were dismissed by the prosecution without prejudice.

He was beaten to a pulp in Kah Tai Park while awaiting trial on his latest charges, which include two counts of selling methamphetamine in a school zone. His trial has been postponed because of “medical issues.”

Police have found nothing to indicate that the victim has in any way been connected to any sex crime as alleged by his attackers.